首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Therapeutic Advances in Urology >Electrical neuromodulation in the management of lower urinary tract dysfunction: evidence experience and future prospects
【2h】

Electrical neuromodulation in the management of lower urinary tract dysfunction: evidence experience and future prospects

机译:电神经调节治疗下尿路功能障碍:证据经验和未来前景

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD) is common and causes a spectrum of morbidity and decreased quality of life (QoL) for patients. LUTD can range from urinary retention to urge incontinence, and includes a variety of syndromes, with the most common and widely recognized being overactive bladder (OAB). The classic treatments of LUTD and OAB comprise different strategies including behavioral therapies, medications and minimally invasive or invasive surgical procedures. Generally, once patients have tried behavioral modifications and oral medical therapy, and have not experienced adequate relief of their symptoms, the next step is to consider minimally invasive therapies. In the last two decades since FDA approval, sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) has become an accepted intervention, with increasing use and evidence of effectiveness for LUTD, specifically OAB and non-obstructive urinary retention. SNS has shown both objective and subjective improvement in voiding symptoms in several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) when compared to sham or standard medical therapy. The main limitations for more extensive use include relatively high cost, implantation of a device and possibly reoperation secondary to adverse events (AE). Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) is a less invasive, less direct and less expensive method for neuromodulation, which has also shown effectiveness in several randomized and non-randomized trials, including comparable improvement rates to anticholinergics in OAB management. However, the efficacy of PTNS is only maintained for a short period after the stimulation is delivered. This technique has a much lower rate of AE compared to SNS, but with the inconvenience of weekly visits for stimulation, although implantable devices are on the horizon. In this article we review the mechanism of action, indications, effectiveness and complications related to SNS and PTNS therapy for LUTD.
机译:下尿路功能障碍(LUTD)很常见,会引起一系列发病率,并降低患者的生活质量(QoL)。 LUTD的范围从尿retention留到急迫性尿失禁,包括多种综合征,最常见和公认的是膀胱过度活动症(OAB)。 LUTD和OAB的经典疗法包括不同的策略,包括行为疗法,药物和微创或有创外科手术程序。通常,一旦患者尝试了行为改变和口服药物治疗,而症状仍未得到充分缓解,下一步就是考虑采用微创疗法。自从FDA批准以来的最近二十年中,with神经刺激(SNS)已成为一种公认的干预措施,其使用的LUTD(特别是OAB和无阻塞性尿retention留)的使用和证据不断增加。与假手术或标准药物治疗相比,SNS在多项随机对照试验(RCT)中均显示出排尿症状的客观和主观改善。更广泛使用的主要限制包括相对较高的成本,设备的植入以及可能因不良事件(AE)而再次手术。经皮胫神经刺激(PTNS)是一种神经调节的侵入性较小,直接性较低且成本较低的方法,该方法在多项随机和非随机试验中也显示出了有效性,包括在OAB治疗中抗胆碱药的改善率相当。但是,PTNS的功效只能在刺激被传递后的短时间内保持。与SNS相比,该技术的AE率要低得多,但是尽管即将出现可植入设备,但每周进行一次刺激都带来了不便。在本文中,我们回顾了LUTD的SNS和PTNS治疗相关的作用机制,适应症,有效性和并发症。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号