首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Systematic Reviews >Should we ‘hug a hoodie’? Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions with young people not in employment education or training (so-called NEETs)
【2h】

Should we ‘hug a hoodie’? Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions with young people not in employment education or training (so-called NEETs)

机译:我们应该拥抱连帽衫吗?对未就业未受教育或培训的年轻人进行干预的系统评价和荟萃分析的协议(所谓的NEET)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundWhilst the majority of young people succeed in education and make a positive transition to the world of work and adult life, recent statistics identify that youth comprise 40% of the world's unemployed, equating to nearly 75 million individuals. These numbers are associated with both decreased economic activity and adverse well-being, with accompanying social, health and financial costs. As a result, a wide range of providers have implemented interventions targeting this population; however, their relative effectiveness is unknown. This is exacerbated by a diverse literature base, the delivery of provision and policy across multiple sectors and disparate approaches to programme evaluation.
机译:背景信息虽然大多数年轻人成功地接受了教育并向工作和成人生活领域积极过渡,但最近的统计数据表明,青年占世界失业人口的40%,即近7500万人。这些数字与减少的经济活动和不利的福祉相关,并伴随着社会,健康和财务成本。结果,各种各样的提供者针对该人群实施了干预措施;但是,它们的相对有效性尚不清楚。多元化的文献基础,跨多个部门的规定和政策的交付以及方案评估的不同方法,加剧了这一点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号