首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Systematic Reviews >Evaluating Data Abstraction Assistant a novel software application for data abstraction during systematic reviews: protocol for a randomized controlled trial
【2h】

Evaluating Data Abstraction Assistant a novel software application for data abstraction during systematic reviews: protocol for a randomized controlled trial

机译:评估数据抽象助手一种用于系统审查期间数据抽象的新型软件应用程序:随机对照试验的方案

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundData abstraction, a critical systematic review step, is time-consuming and prone to errors. Current standards for approaches to data abstraction rest on a weak evidence base. We developed the Data Abstraction Assistant (DAA), a novel software application designed to facilitate the abstraction process by allowing users to (1) view study article PDFs juxtaposed to electronic data abstraction forms linked to a data abstraction system, (2) highlight (or “pin”) the location of the text in the PDF, and (3) copy relevant text from the PDF into the form. We describe the design of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) that compares the relative effectiveness of (A) DAA-facilitated single abstraction plus verification by a second person, (B) traditional (non-DAA-facilitated) single abstraction plus verification by a second person, and (C) traditional independent dual abstraction plus adjudication to ascertain the accuracy and efficiency of abstraction.
机译:BackgroundData抽象是一项关键的系统检查步骤,非常耗时且容易出错。当前数据抽象方法的标准基于薄弱的证据基础。我们开发了数据抽象助手(DAA),这是一种新颖的软件应用程序,旨在允许用户(1)查看与链接到数据抽象系统的电子数据抽象形式并列的研究文章PDF,(2)突出显示(或“固定”)文本在PDF中的位置,以及(3)将相关文本从PDF复制到表单中。我们描述了一项随机对照试验(RCT)的设计,该试验比较了(A)由DAA协助的第二人进行单次提取和验证,(B)传统(非DAA促进的)单一人进行单次验证和相对验证的相对有效性。第二个人,以及(C)传统独立的双重抽象加上裁决,以确定抽象的准确性和效率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号