首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience >Threat/reward-sensitivity and hypomanic-personality modulate cognitive-control and attentional neural processes to emotional stimuli
【2h】

Threat/reward-sensitivity and hypomanic-personality modulate cognitive-control and attentional neural processes to emotional stimuli

机译:威胁/奖励敏感性和躁狂性人格调节认知控制和注意神经过程对情绪刺激的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Temperamental-traits (e.g. threat/reward-sensitivity) are found to modulate cognitive-control and attentional-processes. Yet, it is unclear exactly how these traits interact with emotional-stimuli in the modulation of cognitive-control, as reflected by the N2 event-related potential (ERP), and attentional-processes, as reflected by the P2 and P3 ERPs. Here in an ERP emotional-Go/NoGo task, 36 participants were instructed to inhibit their response to Fearful- and Happy-faces. Individual-differences in threat-sensitivity, reward-sensitivity and hypomanic-personality were assessed through self-report. Hypomanic-personality was assessed, given its relationship with reward-sensitivity and relevance to mood-disorder symptoms. Concerning cognitive-control, individuals with elevated threat-sensitivity displayed more-negative N2s to Happy-NoGo (relative to Fearful-NoGo) faces, whereas both individuals with elevated reward-sensitivity and hypomanic-personality displayed more-negative N2s to Fearful-NoGo (relative to Happy-NoGo) faces. Accordingly, when cognitive-control is required (during Go/NoGo), a mismatch between one’s temperament and the valence of the NoGo-stimulus elevates detection of the need for cognitive-control. Conversely, the modulation of attentional-processing was specific to threat-sensitivity, as there was no relationship between either reward-sensitivity or hypomanic-personality and attentional-processing. Elevated threat-sensitivity was associated with enhanced early (P2s) and later (P3s) attentional-processing to Fearful-NoGo (relative to Happy-NoGo) faces. These latter findings support the negative attentional-bias model relating elevated threat-sensitivity with attentional-biases toward negative-stimuli and away from positive-stimuli.
机译:发现气质特征(例如威胁/奖励敏感性)调节认知控制和注意过程。然而,目前尚不清楚这些特征如何与情绪刺激在认知控制的调节中相互作用,如N2事件相关电位(ERP)和P2和P3 ERP所反映的注意力过程。在ERP情感去/不去任务中,指示36名参与者抑制他们对恐惧面孔和快乐面孔的反应。通过自我报告评估威胁敏感性,奖励敏感性和躁狂性人格方面的个体差异。评估了低躁狂人格,因为其与奖励敏感性和与情绪障碍症状的相关性有关。关于认知控制,威胁敏感性较高的个体对Happy-NoGo(相对于Fearful-NoGo)的脸表现出更负的N2,而奖励敏感度和躁狂人格升高的个体对Fearful-NoGo表现出更负的N2。 (相对于Happy-NoGo)。因此,当需要认知控制时(在Go / NoGo期间),一个人的气质与NoGo刺激的效价之间的不匹配会提高对认知控制需求的检测。相反,注意处理的调制特定于威胁敏感度,因为奖励敏感度或躁狂性人格与注意处理之间没有关系。较高的威胁敏感性与Fearful-NoGo(相对于Happy-NoGo)脸部的早期(P2s)和后期(P3s)注意处理增强有关。后面的这些发现支持了负面注意力偏向模型,该模型将威胁敏感性提高与注意力偏向负刺激和远离正刺激的偏向联系起来。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号