首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Sensors (Basel Switzerland) >Methodological Comparison between a Novel Automatic Sampling System for Gas Chromatography versus Photoacoustic Spectroscopy for Measuring Greenhouse Gas Emissions under Field Conditions
【2h】

Methodological Comparison between a Novel Automatic Sampling System for Gas Chromatography versus Photoacoustic Spectroscopy for Measuring Greenhouse Gas Emissions under Field Conditions

机译:新型气相色谱自动取样系统与光声光谱法在野外条件下测量温室气体排放的方法学比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Trace gases such as nitrous oxide (N2O), methane (CH4), and carbon dioxide (CO2) are climate-related gases, and their emissions from agricultural livestock barns are not negligible. Conventional measurement systems in the field (Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR); photoacoustic system (PAS)) are not sufficiently sensitive to N2O. Laser-based measurement systems are highly accurate, but they are very expensive to purchase and maintain. One cost-effective alternative is gas chromatography (GC) with electron capture detection (ECD), but this is not suitable for field applications due to radiation. Measuring samples collected automatically under field conditions in the laboratory at a subsequent time presents many challenges. This study presents a sampling designed to promote laboratory analysis of N2O concentrations sampled under field conditions. Analyses were carried out using PAS in the field (online system) and GC in the laboratory (offline system). Both measurement systems showed a good correlation for CH4 and CO2 concentrations. Measured N2O concentrations were near the detection limit for PAS. GC achieved more reliable results for N2O in very low concentration ranges.
机译:一氧化二氮(N2O),甲烷(CH4)和二氧化碳(CO2)等微量气体是与气候相关的气体,其从农业畜舍中的排放量不可忽略。该领域的常规测量系统(傅里叶变换红外光谱(FTIR);光声系统(PAS))对N2O不够敏感。基于激光的测量系统非常精确,但是购买和维护它们非常昂贵。一种具有成本效益的替代方法是带有电子捕获检测(ECD)的气相色谱(GC),但由于辐射而不适用于现场应用。随后在实验室中,在野外条件下对自动采集的样品进行测量面临许多挑战。这项研究提出了一个旨在促进对野外条件下采样的N2O浓度进行实验室分析的采样。分析是在现场使用PAS(在线系统),在实验室使用GC(离线系统)进行的。两种测量系统均显示出CH4和CO2浓度的良好相关性。测得的N2O浓度接近PAS的检测极限。在非常低的浓度范围内,GC对N2O取得了更可靠的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号