首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Sensors (Basel Switzerland) >Evaluation and Intercomparison of MODIS and GEOV1 Global Leaf Area Index Products over Four Sites in North China
【2h】

Evaluation and Intercomparison of MODIS and GEOV1 Global Leaf Area Index Products over Four Sites in North China

机译:华北四个地点的MODIS和GEOV1全球叶面积指数产品的评估和比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study investigated the performances of the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and GEOLAND2 Version 1 (GEOV1) Leaf Area Index (LAI) products using ground measurements and LAI reference maps over four sites in North China for 2011–2013. The Terra + Aqua MODIS and Terra MODIS LAI retrieved by the main algorithm and GEOV1 LAI within the valid range were evaluated and intercompared using LAI reference maps to assess their uncertainty and seasonal variability The results showed that GEOV1 LAI is the most similar product with the LAI reference maps (R2 = 0.78 and RMSE = 0.59). The MODIS products performed well for biomes with low LAI values, but considerable uncertainty arose when the LAI was larger than 3. Terra + Aqua MODIS (R2 = 0.72 and RMSE = 0.68) was slightly more accurate than Terra MODIS (R2 = 0.57 and RMSE = 0.90) for producing slightly more successful observations. Both MODIS and GEOV1 products effectively followed the seasonal trajectory of the reference maps, and GEOV1 exhibited a smoother seasonal trajectory than MODIS. MODIS anomalies mainly occurred during summer and likely occurred because of surface reflectance uncertainty, shorter temporal resolutions and inconsistency between simulated and MODIS surface reflectances. This study suggests that further improvements of the MODIS LAI products should focus on finer algorithm inputs and improved seasonal variation modeling of MODIS observations. Future field work considering finer biome maps and better generation of LAI reference maps is still needed.
机译:这项研究使用地面测量和LAI参考地图在华北地区的四个站点(2011-2013年)调查了中分辨率成像光谱仪(MODIS)和GEOLAND2版本1(GEOV1)叶面积指数(LAI)产品的性能。使用LAI参考图对主要算法检索的Terra + Aqua MODIS和Terra MODIS LAI以及有效范围内的GEOV1 LAI进行了评估和比较,以评估其不确定性和季节性变化。结果表明,GEOV1 LAI是与LAI最相似的产品参考图(R 2 = 0.78和RMSE = 0.59)。对于低LAI值的生物群落,MODIS产品表现良好,但是当LAI大于3时,出现了相当大的不确定性。Terra + Aqua MODIS(R 2 = 0.72和RMSE = 0.68)比精度更高。 Terra MODIS(R 2 = 0.57和RMSE = 0.90)可产生更成功的观测结果。 MODIS和GEOV1产品均有效地遵循了参考地图的季节性轨迹,并且GEOV1的季节性轨迹比MODIS更平滑。 MODIS异常主要发生在夏季,并且可能是由于表面反射率不确定性,较短的时间分辨率以及模拟和MODIS表面反射率之间的不一致而发生的。这项研究表明,对MODIS LAI产品的进一步改进应该集中在更精细的算法输入和改进的MODIS观测值的季节性变化模型上。未来的田间工作仍需要考虑更精细的生物群落图和更好的LAI参考图生成。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号