首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Japan Medical Association Journal : JMAJ >Large-scale Health Information Database and Privacy Protection
【2h】

Large-scale Health Information Database and Privacy Protection

机译:大型健康信息数据库和隐私保护

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Japan was once progressive in the digitalization of healthcare fields but unfortunately has fallen behind in terms of the secondary use of data for public interest. There has recently been a trend to establish large-scale health databases in the nation, and a conflict between data use for public interest and privacy protection has surfaced as this trend has progressed. Databases for health insurance claims or for specific health checkups and guidance services were created according to the law that aims to ensure healthcare for the elderly; however, there is no mention in the act about using these databases for public interest in general. Thus, an initiative for such use must proceed carefully and attentively.The PMDA projects that collect a large amount of medical record information from large hospitals and the health database development project that the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) is working on will soon begin to operate according to a general consensus; however, the validity of this consensus can be questioned if issues of anonymity arise. The likelihood that researchers conducting a study for public interest would intentionally invade the privacy of their subjects is slim. However, patients could develop a sense of distrust about their data being used since legal requirements are ambiguous. Nevertheless, without using patients’ medical records for public interest, progress in medicine will grind to a halt. Proper legislation that is clear for both researchers and patients will therefore be highly desirable.A revision of the Act on the Protection of Personal Information is currently in progress. In reality, however, privacy is not something that laws alone can protect; it will also require guidelines and self-discipline. We now live in an information capitalization age. I will introduce the trends in legal reform regarding healthcare information and discuss some basics to help people properly face the issue of health big data and privacy protection with a sense of ownership.
机译:日本曾经在医疗保健领域的数字化方面取得进步,但不幸的是,在为了公众利益而二次使用数据方面一直落后于日本。最近,在美国建立大型健康数据库的趋势已经出现,随着这种趋势的发展,用于公共利益的数据和隐私保护之间的冲突也逐渐浮出水面。根据旨在确保老年人保健的法律,建立了健康保险索赔或特定健康检查和指导服务的数据库;但是,该法案中没有提到将这些数据库用于一般公众利益。因此,必须谨慎,专心地进行这种使用。PMDA 项目从大型医院收集了大量病历信息,而健康数据库开发项目厚生劳动省(MHLW)正在进行的工作将很快根据普遍共识开始运作;但是,如果出现匿名问题,可以质疑该共识的有效性。为了公共利益而进行研究的研究人员有意侵入其受试者的隐私的可能性很小。但是,由于法律要求不明确,患者可能会对使用的数据产生不信任感。尽管如此,如果不将患者的病历用于公共利益,医学进展将会停滞不前。因此,非常需要研究人员和患者都清楚的适当立法。目前正在修订《个人信息保护法》。但是,实际上,隐私并不是法律可以单独保护的。它还需要准则和自律。我们现在生活在信息资本化时代。我将介绍有关医疗保健信息的法律改革的趋势,并讨论一些基础知识,以帮助人们正确地面对拥有所有权的健康大数据和隐私保护问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号