首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Scientific World Journal >Comparison of Soil Phosphorus Tests for Assessing Plant Availability of Phosphorus in an Ultisol Amended with Water-Soluble and Phosphate Rock Sources
【2h】

Comparison of Soil Phosphorus Tests for Assessing Plant Availability of Phosphorus in an Ultisol Amended with Water-Soluble and Phosphate Rock Sources

机译:评估水溶性和磷酸盐岩源改良的Ultisol中磷的植物有效性的土壤磷测试的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The effectiveness of different soil tests in assessing soil phosphorus (P) in soils amended with phosphate rocks (PRs) is uncertain. We evaluated the effects of triple superphosphate (TSP) and PRs on extractable P by conventional soil tests (Mehlich 3 [Meh3] and Bray-1 [B1]) and a nonconventional test (iron oxide–impregnated paper, strip). Extracted amounts of P were in the order: Meh3 >B1 > strip. All the tests were significantly correlated (p = 0.001). Acidic reagents extracted more P from TSP than PRs, while the strip removed equal amounts from the two sources. The P removed by the three tests was related significantly to dry matter yield (DMY), but only in the first harvest, except for B1. Established critical P levels (CPLs) differed for TSP and PRs. In PR-fertilized soils, CPLs were 27, 17, and 12 mg P kg-1soil for Meh3, B1, and strip, respectively, and 42, 31, and 12 mg P kg-1 soil, respectively, in TSP-fertilized soils. Thus, the strip resulted in a common CPL for TSP and PRs (12 mg P kg-1 soil). This method can be used effectively in soils where integrated nutrient sources have been used, but there is need to establish CPLs for different crops. For cost-effective fertilizer P recommendations based on conventional soil tests, there is a need to conduct separate calibrations for TSP- and PR-fertilized soils.
机译:在用磷酸盐岩(PRs)修正的土壤中评估土壤磷(P)的不同土壤测试的有效性尚不确定。我们通过常规土壤试验(Mehlich 3 [Meh3]和Bray-1 [B1])和非常规试验(氧化铁浸渍纸,试纸)评估了三重过磷酸盐(TSP)和PR对可萃取磷的影响。 P的提取量顺序为:Meh3> B1>条。所有测试均显着相关(p = 0.001)。酸性试剂从TSP提取的P中比PR提取的P多,而试纸条从两种来源中提取的P量相等。通过这三个测试去除的磷与干物质产量(DMY)显着相关,但仅在第一次收获时才出现,除了B1。对于TSP和PR,已建立的关键P级别(CPL)不同。在PR施肥的土壤中,Meh3,B1和Strip的CPL分别为27、17和12 mg P kg -1 土壤,以及42、31和12 mg P kg 在TSP施肥的土壤中分别为-1 土壤。因此,该胶条导致了TSP和PRs的共同CPL(12 mg P kg -1 土壤)。该方法可以有效地用于已使用综合养分来源的土壤中,但需要为不同作物建立CPL。对于基于常规土壤测试的经济高效的肥料P建议,需要对TSP和PR施肥的土壤分别进行校准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号