首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Schizophrenia Bulletin >SA27. Reinforcement Learning Performance in Early Schizophrenia Patients and Their Nonpsychotic Siblings
【2h】

SA27. Reinforcement Learning Performance in Early Schizophrenia Patients and Their Nonpsychotic Siblings

机译:SA27。早期精神分裂症患者及其非精神病兄弟姐妹的强化学习表现

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: While it is well established that schizophrenia is highly heritable, the genetic architecture of the disorder remains unclear. Reinforcement learning deficits, which have been consistently shown to be present in schizophrenia patients, may represent a potential endophenotypic marker for the disorder. This study aims to compare early schizophrenia patients and their nonpsychotic siblings in reinforcement learning performance. >Methods: Thirty-four patents with DSM-IV diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or schizophreniform disorder with illness duration fewer than 5 years were recruited in specialized early intervention service in Hong Kong. Thirty-four nonpsychotic siblings of the patients and 33 healthy controls were also enrolled. Each participant completed a computerized Go/No Go task, in which they had to decide whether or not to choose each stimulus that had different reinforcement probabilities. The task comprised 3 training blocks and 1 transfer/test phase presenting novel combinations of previously learned stimuli. A battery of cognitive assessments was administered to patients, siblings, and controls. Omnibus repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and 1-way ANOVAs were used to compare reinforcement learning measures of the 3 groups. >Results: The 3 groups were comparable in age, gender ratio, and educational level. An omnibus repeated measures ANOVA revealed significant group differences in response accuracy across the training phase, F(2, 98) = 3.23, P = .04). One-way ANOVAs with post hoc Tukey’s honest significant difference tests revealed that patients (M = 0.81, SD = 0.19) performed significantly worse than controls (M = 0.92, SD = 0.11) in reward-driven reinforcement learning in Block 3 (P = .02), and on average, both patients (M = 0.81, SD = 0.13) and siblings (M = 0.82, SD = 0.13) were significantly less accurate in reward-driven learning than controls (M = 0.90, SD = 0.11) across the training blocks (patients vs controls: P = .02; siblings vs. controls: P = .04). There was no group difference in learning measures in the transfer/test phase. >Conclusion: Our preliminary results indicate that both early schizophrenia patients and their nonpsychotic siblings exhibit poorer performance on gradual reward-driven (i.e., positive) reinforcement learning in the training phase relative to healthy controls. As the study is ongoing, a comprehensive data analysis with a larger sample size will provide more definitive results regarding whether reinforcement learning may represent a potentially useful endophenotype for schizophrenia research.
机译:>背景:虽然公认精神分裂症是高度可遗传的,但该疾病的遗传结构仍不清楚。一直被证明在精神分裂症患者中存在的强化学习缺陷可能代表了该疾病的潜在表型标记。这项研究旨在比较早期精神分裂症患者及其非精神病性兄弟姐妹在强化学习中的表现。 >方法:在香港专门的早期干预服务中,招募了34项DSM-IV诊断为精神分裂症,精神分裂症或精神分裂症的患者,其病程少于5年。还招募了该患者的34名非精神病性兄弟姐妹和33名健康对照者。每个参与者完成了一个计算机化的“通过/不通过”任务,他们必须决定是否选择具有不同强化概率的每种刺激。该任务包括3个训练块和1个转移/测试阶段,这些阶段介绍了先前学习的刺激的新颖组合。对患者,兄弟姐妹和对照组进行了一系列认知评估。使用综合重复方差分析(ANOVA)和1次方差分析比较3组的强化学习量度。 >结果:这3个小组的年龄,性别比和教育程度具有可比性。一项重复测量的方差分析显示,整个训练阶段的反应准确性存在显着的组差异,F(2,98)= 3.23,P = .04)。单次方差分析与事后Tukey的诚实显着差异测试显示,在第3区块的奖励驱动强化学习中,患者(M = 0.81,SD = 0.19)的表现显着低于对照组(M = 0.92,SD = 0.11)(P = .02),平均而言,在奖励驱动学习中,患者(M = 0.81,SD = 0.13)和兄弟姐妹(M = 0.82,SD = 0.13)的准确率明显低于对照组(M = 0.90,SD = 0.11)跨训练块(患者与对照组:P = .02;兄弟姐妹与对照组:P = .04)。在转移/测试阶段,学习方法没有小组差异。 >结论:我们的初步结果表明,相对于健康对照组,早期精神分裂症患者及其非精神病性兄弟姐妹在逐步奖励驱动(即积极)的强化学习中均表现较差。随着研究的进行,具有更大样本量的综合数据分析将提供关于强化学习是否可以代表精神分裂症研究的潜在有用表型的更明确的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号