首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Schizophrenia Bulletin >205. Machine Learning to Further Improve Classification of Psychotic Disorders Using Clinical and Biological Stratification: Updates From the Bipolar Schizophrenia Network for Intermediate Phenotypes (BSNIP)
【2h】

205. Machine Learning to Further Improve Classification of Psychotic Disorders Using Clinical and Biological Stratification: Updates From the Bipolar Schizophrenia Network for Intermediate Phenotypes (BSNIP)

机译:205.机器学习通过临床和生物学分层进一步改善精神疾病的分类:双相精神分裂症中型表型(BSNIP)的更新

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Classification in psychiatry continues to suffer from challenges to validity of the distinctions between its diagnostic categories. The fundamental goal of this study is to delineate different types of psychosis using a stratified approach involving both biological and clinical information. >Methods: Patients with a psychotic disorder (n = 404) were recruited at 5 sites and underwent MRI scans, EEG scans, and comprehensive clinical and neuropsychological assessments. A stratified machine learning (nonlinear K-means clustering) approach using clinical and biological information was tested against classifications built using clinical or biological information alone. >Results: The optimal number of clusters was determined to be 3. Using silhouette scores to evaluate the separation of clusters using different approaches, we observed that the stratified approach—clinical + biological information— outperformed the others with a score of 0.523, improving on clinical or biological only, with scores of 0.230 and 0.290, respectively. The stratified clusters also separated more on regional brain volumes and global assessment of function compared to clinically separated groups, with Group 1 showing the largest deficits—effect sizes ranged from 0.4 to 1.1. >Conclusion: The findings show promise for improved classifications for psychotic disorders by leveraging existing clinical insights with newfound knowledge from biological psychiatry. The findings also demonstrate that new methods such as machine learning can be instrumental in helping us deliver on this promise.
机译:>背景:精神病学分类继续遭受对其诊断类别之间的区分有效性的挑战。这项研究的基本目标是使用一种涉及生物学和临床信息的分层方法来描述不同类型的精神病。 >方法:在5个地点招募了精神病患者(n = 404),并对其进行了MRI扫描,EEG扫描以及全面的临床和神经心理学评估。针对仅使用临床或生物学信息建立的分类,对使用临床和生物学信息的分层机器学习(非线性K均值聚类)方法进行了测试。 >结果:确定的最佳聚类数目为3。使用轮廓分值来评估使用不同方法的聚类分离,我们观察到分层方法(临床+生物学信息)在性能上优于其他方法。得分为0.523,仅在临床或生物学上有所改善,分别为0.230和0.290。与临床上分离的组相比,分层的组在区域脑容量和整体功能评估上也分离得更多,第1组显示出最大的缺陷-作用大小范围为0.4到1.1。 >结论:研究结果表明,通过利用现有的临床见解和生物学精神病学的新知识,可以改善精神病的分类。研究结果还表明,机器学习等新方法可以帮助我们兑现这一承诺。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号