首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Schizophrenia Bulletin >129. Lower Prepulse Inhibition in Clinical High-Risk Group but not in Familial Risk Group for Psychosis Compared to Healthy Controls
【2h】

129. Lower Prepulse Inhibition in Clinical High-Risk Group but not in Familial Risk Group for Psychosis Compared to Healthy Controls

机译:129.与健康对照组相比临床高风险组的精神抑制水平较低但家族性精神病风险组的抑制水平较低

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Although lower level of prepulse inhibition (PPI) of startle response is well known in schizophrenia, it is not clear when this begins. The aim of this study is to investigate acoustic PPI in clinical and familial risk of psychosis >Methods: We studied PPI in a sample of individuals with Ultra High Risk (UHR) for psychosis, a group of familial risk for psychosis and healthy controls (HC). UHR was defined based on CAARMS (n = 25), FR group consist of siblings of patients with schizophrenia (n = 24). We collected clinical data by using BPRS-E, SANS, SAPS, PAS when individuals with UHR were antipsychotic-naive. A cognitive battery containing RVLT, WCST, Stroop, digit-symbol and TMT was applied to all participants. Interval between S1 (20 ms, 86 dB) and S2 (40 ms, 115 dB) was 120 ms, and there was a 70-dB background white noise during the experiment. >Results: There was a significant difference in PPI among the 3 groups. Post hoc analysis showed that PPI was lower in UHR group than both FR (z = 2.27, P = .02) and HC groups (z = 2.53, P = .01), and there was no difference between FR and HC groups. Mean S1 was higher in FR group than UHR group (z = 2.23, P = .02). PPI and S1 amplitude were not found correlated with BPRS-E, SANS, SAPS scores, and cognitive test scores. >Conclusion: Our findings show that PPI deficits begins before the onset of psychosis, and it is more prominent in those with clinical risk rather than familial risk for psychosis
机译:>背景:尽管精神分裂症患者惊恐反应的预脉冲抑制(PPI)较低,但尚不清楚何时开始。这项研究的目的是研究在临床和家族性精神病风险中的声学PPI。>方法:我们在超高风险精神病(UHR)个体的样本中研究了PPI,这是一组精神疾病的家族性风险。精神病和健康控制(HC)。 UHR是根据CAARMS(n = 25)定义的,FR组由精神分裂症患者的兄弟姐妹组成(n = 24)。当UHR初次使用抗精神病药时,我们使用BPRS-E,SANS,SAPS,PAS收集临床数据。所有参与者都使用了包含RVLT,WCST,Stroop,数字符号和TMT的认知电池。 S1(20µms,86 dB)和S2(40µms,115 dB)之间的间隔为120µms,并且在实验期间存在70 dB的背景白噪声。 >结果:3组之间的PPI有显着差异。事后分析显示,UHR组的PPI低于FR组(z = 2.27,P = .02)和HC组(z = 2.53,P = .01),并且FR组和HC组之间没有差异。 FR组的平均S1高于UHR组(z = 2.23,P = .02)。未发现PPI和S1振幅与BPRS-E,SANS,SAPS分数和认知测验分数相关。 >结论:我们的研究结果表明,PPI缺陷在精神病发作之前就开始出现,在具有临床风险而非家族性精神病风险的人中更为突出

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号