首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Schizophrenia Bulletin >Effort-Based Decision-Making Paradigms for Clinical Trials in Schizophrenia: Part 1—Psychometric Characteristics of 5 Paradigms
【2h】

Effort-Based Decision-Making Paradigms for Clinical Trials in Schizophrenia: Part 1—Psychometric Characteristics of 5 Paradigms

机译:精神分裂症基于临床试验的基于努力的决策范例:第1部分— 5种范例的心理计量学特征

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Impairments in willingness to exert effort contribute to the motivational deficits characteristic of the negative symptoms of schizophrenia. The current study evaluated the psychometric properties of 5 new or adapted paradigms to determine their suitability for use in clinical trials of schizophrenia. This study included 94 clinically stable participants with schizophrenia and 40 healthy controls. The effort-based decision-making battery was administered twice to the schizophrenia group (baseline, 4-week retest) and once to the control group. The 5 paradigms included 1 that assesses cognitive effort, 1 perceptual effort, and 3 that assess physical effort. Each paradigm was evaluated on (1) patient vs healthy control group differences, (2) test-retest reliability, (3) utility as a repeated measure (ie, practice effects), and (4) tolerability. The 5 paradigms showed varying psychometric strengths and weaknesses. The Effort Expenditure for Rewards Task showed the best reliability and utility as a repeated measure, while the Grip Effort Task had significant patient-control group differences, and superior tolerability and administration duration. The other paradigms showed weaker psychometric characteristics in their current forms. These findings highlight challenges in adapting effort and motivation paradigms for use in clinical trials.
机译:付出努力的意愿受损会导致精神分裂症阴性症状的动机缺陷。本研究评估了5种新的或改编的范式的心理测量特性,以确定它们在精神分裂症临床试验中的适用性。这项研究包括94位精神分裂症的临床稳定参与者和40位健康对照。对精神分裂症组进行两次基于工作量的决策制定(基线,4周复检),对对照组进行一次。这5个范例包括1个评估认知力,1个感知力和3个体力。在(1)患者与健康对照组之间的差异,(2)重测信度,(3)用作重复测量的效用(即实践效果)和(4)耐受性方面评估了每个范例。这五个范式显示出不同的心理测验优势和劣势。奖励任务的努力支出显示出最佳的可靠性和实用性作为重复测量,而“抓地力任务”具有显着的患者-对照组差异,出色的耐受性和给药时间。其他范式在目前的形式上表现出较弱的心理测量特征。这些发现突出说明了在临床试验中使用努力和动机范例的挑战。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号