首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Safety and Health at Work >Essential Occupational Safety and Health Interventions for Low- and Middle-income Countries: An Overview of the Evidence
【2h】

Essential Occupational Safety and Health Interventions for Low- and Middle-income Countries: An Overview of the Evidence

机译:中低收入国家的基本职业安全与卫生干预措施:证据概述

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

There is still a considerable burden of occupational diseases and injuries in the world. It is not well known which interventions can effectively reduce the exposures at work that cause this burden. The objective of this article is to summarize evidence from systematic reviews of interventions to prevent occupational diseases and injuries. We included systematic reviews of interventions to reduce the incidence of work-related cancer, dust-related diseases, occupational asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, noiseinduced hearing loss, back pain, and occupational injuries. We searched Medline and Embase with predefined search strategies to locate systematic reviews of these interventions. We found 23 systematic reviews of which the results are also applicable to low- and middle income countries. Effective measures to reduce exposure leading to work-related cancer, dust-related diseases, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, noise, and injuries are available. However, better implementation of these measures is needed. Regulation, enforcement of regulation, and incentives for employers are effective interventions to achieve this goal. There is evidence that feedback and rewards for workers help in reducing occupational injuries. There is no evidence in many studies that back pain can be prevented. Personal protective equipment technically has the potential to reduce exposure but this is difficult to put into effect. There is no evidence in the studies regarding the effectiveness of education and training, preventive drugs, or health examinations. There is evidence that the implementation of technical measures enforced by regulation can prevent occupational diseases and injuries. For other interventions such as education or health examinations, there is no evidence that supports their effectiveness. More systematic reviews are needed in the area of injury prevention.
机译:世界上仍然存在相当大的职业病和伤害负担。尚不清楚哪种干预措施可以有效减少造成这种负担的工作量。本文的目的是总结对预防职业病和伤害的干预措施的系统评价得出的证据。我们纳入了对干预措施的系统评价,以减少与工作相关的癌症,与粉尘相关的疾病,职业性哮喘,慢性阻塞性肺疾病,噪声引起的听力损失,背痛和职业伤害的发生率。我们使用预定义的搜索策略搜索了Medline和Embase,以找到对这些干预措施的系统评价。我们发现了23条系统评价,其结果也适用于中低收入国家。可以采取有效措施来减少暴露,从而避免导致与工作有关的癌症,与尘埃有关的疾病,哮喘,慢性阻塞性肺疾病,噪音和伤害。但是,需要更好地执行这些措施。法规,法规的实施以及对雇主的激励措施是实现这一目标的有效干预措施。有证据表明,对工人的反馈和报酬有助于减少职业伤害。在许多研究中没有证据表明可以预防背痛。从技术上讲,个人防护设备具有减少接触的潜力,但这很难实现。研究中没有证据表明教育和培训,预防药物或健康检查的有效性。有证据表明,实施法规强制执行的技术措施可以预防职业病和伤害。对于其他干预措施,例如教育或健康检查,没有证据支持其有效性。在伤害预防领域需要更系统的审查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号