首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Review of Diabetic Studies : RDS >The Individualized Target HbA1c: A New Method for Improving Macrovascular Risk and Glycemia Without Hypoglycemia and Weight Gain
【2h】

The Individualized Target HbA1c: A New Method for Improving Macrovascular Risk and Glycemia Without Hypoglycemia and Weight Gain

机译:个性化的目标HbA1c:一种无需大血糖和体重增加即可改善大血管风险和血糖的新方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Both the DCCT and UKPDS trials demonstrated that improved glycemic control reduces microvascular complications. Inconclusive evidence, however, has remained on the question of the effect of glycemic control on macrovascular disease (with special emphasis on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality). In the last year, the data from four large trials were published, directly addressing this question (ACCORD, ADVANCE, VADT and UKPDS-80), yet the results were conflicting. Close inspection of the structure of three of these trials (ACCORD, ADVANCE and VADT) revealed inadequacies that may explain the unfavorable results, such as the inclusion of mainly elderly patients with previous macrovascular complications. It is not surprising that intensive glycemic control resulted in a rise of hypoglycemic events yet did not decrease macrovascular morbidity or mortality in these cohorts. On the other hand, the UKPDS-80 trial, a follow-up of the original UKPDS, showed that intensive glycemic control was beneficial when initiated in newly diagnosed patients. These results led us to develop a new individualized method of determining the target HbA1c based on the characteristics of the individual. This method considers the patient’s possible benefit from glycemic control, the risk of suffering hypoglycemic events and consequences suffered from the hypoglycemic event. It is essential that the target HbA1c be tailored to the patient, with different goals set for the recently diagnosed “healthy” and young patient on the one hand, and the elderly patient with co-morbidities and polypharmacy on the other hand. We further suggest a method of comparing and choosing between the different hypoglycemic drugs available. Drugs should be considered not only based on their hypoglycemic effect but also on several other attributes such as effects on weight, glycemic durability, cardiovascular protection, individual experience with the drug, method of delivery and side effect profiles. Scoring the different attributes allows us to compare between different preparations and choose the most suitable drugs for each individual patient. Using our newly suggested system, a physician will first calculate the adequate HbA1c goal for his patient and then choose the drug that will best suit him, thus tailoring the treatment to the patients needs.
机译:DCCT和UKPDS试验均表明,改善血糖控制可减少微血管并发症。然而,关于血糖控制对大血管疾病的影响(仍特别强调心血管疾病的发病率和死亡率)的问题尚无定论。去年,发表了四项大型试验的数据,直接解决了这个问题(ACCORD,ADVANCE,VADT和UKPDS-80),但结果相矛盾。对其中三个试验(ACCORD,ADVANCE和VADT)的结构进行了仔细检查,发现其不足之处可能解释了不良结果,例如,主要包括有大血管并发症的老年患者。不足为奇的是,严格的血糖控制导致降血糖事件增加,但并未降低这些人群的大血管发病率或死亡率。另一方面,UKPDS-80试验是对原始UKPDS的后续研究,结果表明,在新诊断的患者中开始进行严格的血糖控制是有益的。这些结果使我们开发了一种新的个性化方法,可以根据个人特征确定目标HbA1c。这种方法考虑了患者从血糖控制中获得的可能收益,发生降血糖事件的风险以及因降血糖事件而遭受的后果。必须针对患者量身定制目标HbA1c,一方面为近期被诊断为“健康”的年轻患者设定不同的目标,另一方面为患有合并症和多药的老年患者设定目标。我们进一步建议一种比较和选择可用的不同降血糖药物的方法。不仅应考虑药物的降血糖作用,还应考虑其他几个属性,例如对体重的影响,血糖的持久性,心血管保护作用,药物的个人经验,给药方法和副作用情况。对不同属性进行评分可以使我们在不同的制剂之间进行比较,并为每个患者选择最合适的药物。使用我们新建议的系统,医生将首先计算出适合患者的HbA1c目标,然后选择最适合他的药物,从而根据患者的需求量身定制治疗方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号