首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Pulmonary Circulation >A systematic review of transition studies of pulmonary arterial hypertension specific medications
【2h】

A systematic review of transition studies of pulmonary arterial hypertension specific medications

机译:对肺动脉高压特定药物的过渡研究的系统综述

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a progressive potentially fatal disease. Multiple pharmacologic options are now available, which facilitated transitions between different therapeutic options, although the evidence for such transitions has not been well described. We sought to review the evidence supporting the safety and/or efficacy of transitioning between PAH-specific medications. We performed a systematic review of all published studies in the Medline database between 1 January 2000 and 30 June 2016 reporting on any transition between the currently Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved PAH-specific medications. Studies reporting on three or more adult patients published in the English language reporting on transitions between FDA-approved PAH medications were extracted and tabulated. Forty-one studies met the selection criteria, nine of which included less than eight patients (and thus were reported separately in the supplement), for a total of 32 studies. Transitioning from parenteral epoprostenol to parenteral treprostinil appears to be safe and efficacious in patients who have less severe disease and more favorable hemodynamics. Transitioning from a prostacyclin analogue to an oral medication may be successful in patients who have favorable hemodynamics and stable disease. There is conflicting evidence supporting the transition from a parenteral to an inhaled prostacyclin analogue, even in patients who are on background oral therapy. Currently, the only evidence in support of transitioning between oral PDE5 inhibitors is from sildenafil to tadalafil. Patients on higher doses of sildenafil are more likely to fail. In patients with liver abnormalities due to bosentan or sitaxentan, the transition to ambrisentan appears to be safe and can result in clinical improvement. Studies regarding PAH medication transitions are limited. Patients who have less severe disease, better functional status, and are on lower medications doses may be more successful at transitioning.
机译:肺动脉高压(PAH)是一种进行性潜在致命疾病。现在可以使用多种药理学选择,这促进了不同治疗选择之间的过渡,尽管尚未充分描述这种过渡的证据。我们试图审查支持PAH专用药物之间转换的安全性和/或功效的证据。我们对2000年1月1日至2016年6月30日在Medline数据库中所有已发表的研究进行了系统的回顾,报告了当前食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准的PAH特异性药物之间的任何过渡。摘录并列出了以英语发表的有关三个或更多成年患者的研究报告,这些研究报告了FDA批准的PAH药物之间的转换。符合选择标准的41项研究,其中9项包括少于8名患者(因此在补充资料中另行报告),​​共32项研究。对于疾病较轻,血液动力学更佳的患者,从肠胃外前烯雌醇向肠胃外曲前列环素的过渡似乎是安全有效的。从前列环素类似物过渡到口服药物在血液动力学和疾病稳定的患者中可能是成功的。有矛盾的证据支持从肠胃外过渡到吸入的前列环素类似物,即使在接受背景口服治疗的患者中也是如此。目前,支持口服PDE5抑制剂之间转换的唯一证据是从西地那非到他达拉非。服用西地那非剂量较高的患者更有可能失败。在由于波生坦或西他森坦而导致肝脏异常的患者中,向安贝生坦的过渡似乎是安全的,并且可以导致临床改善。关于PAH药物转变的研究是有限的。病情较轻,功能状态较好且药物剂量较低的患者可能更容易过渡。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号