首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America >From the Cover: The social networks and structural variation of Mississippian sociopolitics in the southeastern United States
【2h】

From the Cover: The social networks and structural variation of Mississippian sociopolitics in the southeastern United States

机译:从封面:美国东南部密西西比州社会政治的社会网络和结构变异

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Network approaches in archaeology offer a promising avenue for facilitating bottom-up, comparative approaches to sociopolitical organization. While recent applications have focused primarily on migration and demographic trends, identity and identity politics, and the dynamics of geopolitical and regional interaction, little in the way of comparative sociopolitical organization has been attempted. In this study, I present an alternative approach to the use of sociotypological models across southern Appalachia. In particular, I demonstrate the value in employing network analyses as a mode of formally and quantitatively comparing the relational structures and organizations of sociopolitical landscapes; in this case, those traditionally characterized as constellations of chiefdoms. By approaching southern Appalachian histories through the relationships upon which social, political, and economic institutions were actually built, I move the study of southeastern political systems beyond the use of models that emphasize the behaviors of elites and the ruling class as inspired by the ethnographic and ethnohistoric records. To these ends, using a robust regional ceramic dataset, I compare network histories and political landscapes for the southern Appalachian region between ca. AD 800 and 1650. The results of these analyses contribute insights to the study of small-scale political organizations by demonstrating that (i) as chiefdoms developed, leaders drew on preexisting social and political conditions; (ii) while networks of chiefly interaction were defined by instability, wider networks of interaction were much more durable; and (iii) quantitative network analyses and qualitative ethnohistoric accounts can articulate with one another to shed light on indigenous political organization.
机译:考古学中的网络方法为促进自下而上的社会政治组织的比较方法提供了一个有希望的途径。尽管最近的应用主要集中在移民和人口趋势,身份和身份政治以及地缘政治和区域互动的动态上,但很少尝试采用比较社会政治组织的方式。在这项研究中,我提出了在阿巴拉契亚南部地区使用社会类型学模型的另一种方法。特别是,我展示了将网络分析作为正式和定量比较社会政治景观的关系结构和组织的一种模式的价值;在这种情况下,传统上被称为酋长星座。通过通过实际建立社会,政治和经济机构的关系来了解阿巴拉契亚南部的历史,我将对东南部政治制度的研究超越了使用模型,该模型强调的是受民族志和政治学启发的精英和统治阶级的行为。民族史记录。为此,我使用了可靠的区域陶瓷数据集,比较了约阿里巴巴州南部阿巴拉契亚地区的网络历史和政治景观。公元800年和1650年。这些分析的结果通过证明(i)随着领地的发展,领导人借鉴了先前存在的社会和政治条件,为小型政治组织的研究提供了见识。 (ii)虽然主要的互动网络是由不稳定定义的,但更广泛的互动网络则更加持久; (iii)定量网络分析和定性的民族历史叙述可以相互阐明,以阐明土著政治组织。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号