首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America >Direct transfer of NADH between alpha-glycerol phosphate dehydrogenase and lactate dehydrogenase: fact or misinterpretation?
【2h】

Direct transfer of NADH between alpha-glycerol phosphate dehydrogenase and lactate dehydrogenase: fact or misinterpretation?

机译:NADH在α-甘油磷酸脱氢酶和乳酸脱氢酶之间的直接转移:事实还是曲解?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Following the criticism by Chock and Gutfreund [Chock, P.B. & Gutfreund, H. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85, 8870-8874], that our proposal of direct transfer of NADH between glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (alpha-glycerol phosphate dehydrogenase, alpha-GDH; EC 1.1.1.8) and L-lactate dehydrogenase (LDH; EC 1.1.1.27) was based on a misinterpretation of the kinetic data, we have reinvestigated the transfer mechanism between this enzyme pair. By using the "enzyme buffering" steady-state kinetic technique [Srivastava, D.K. & Bernhard, S.A. (1984) Biochemistry 23, 4538-4545], we examined the mechanism (random diffusion vs. direct transfer) of transfer of NADH between rabbit muscle alpha-GDH and pig heart LDH. The steady-state data reveal that the LDH-NADH complex and the alpha-GDH-NADH complex can serve as substrate for the alpha-GDH-catalyzed reaction and the LDH-catalyzed reaction, respectively. This is consistent with the direct-transfer mechanism and inconsistent with a mechanism in which free NADH is the only competent substrate for either enzyme-catalyzed reaction. The discrepancy between this conclusion and that of Chock and Gutfreund comes from (i) their incorrect measurement of the Km for NADH in the alpha-GDH-catalyzed reaction, (ii) inadequate design and range of the steady-state kinetic experiments, and (iii) their qualitative assessment of the prediction of the direct-transfer mechanism. Our transient kinetic measurements for the transfer of NADH from alpha-GDH to LDH and from LDH to alpha-GDH show that both are slower than predicted on the basis of free equilibration of NADH through the aqueous environment. The decrease in the rate of equilibration of NADH between alpha-GDH and LDH provides no support for the random-diffusion mechanism; rather, it suggests a direct interaction between enzymes that modulates the transfer rate of NADH. Thus, contrary to Chock and Gutfreund's conclusion, all our experimental data compel us to propose, once again, that NADH is transferred directly between the sites of alpha-GDH and LDH.
机译:跟随Chock和Gutfreund的批评[Chock,P.B. &Gutfreund,H.(1988),美国Natl。学院科学USA 85,8870-8874],我们的建议是将NADH直接转移至3-磷酸甘油脱氢酶(α-甘油磷酸脱氢酶,α-GDH; EC 1.1.1.8)和L-乳酸脱氢酶(LDH; EC 1.1)之间。 1.27)是基于对动力学数据的错误解释,因此我们重新研究了该酶对之间的转移机制。通过使用“酶缓冲”稳态动力学技术[Srivastava,D.K。 &Bernhard,S.A.(1984)Biochemistry 23,4538-4545],我们研究了兔肌肉α-GDH和猪心脏LDH之间NADH转移的机制(随机扩散与直接转移)。稳态数据表明,LDH-NADH配合物和α-GDH-NADH配合物可以分别用作α-GDH催化反应和LDH催化反应的底物。这与直接转移机制是一致的,并且与其中游离NADH是任一酶催化反应的唯一有效底物的机制不一致。该结论与Chock和Gutfreund的结论之间的差异源于(i)他们在α-GDH催化的反应中对NADH的Km的测量不正确;(ii)稳态动力学实验的设计和范围不足,以及( iii)对直接转移机制的预测进行定性评估。我们对NADH从α-GDH到LDH以及从LDH到α-GDH转移的瞬态动力学测量结果表明,两者均比通过水环境中NADH的自由平衡所预测的要慢。 α-GDH和LDH之间的NADH平衡速率降低,不支持随机扩散机制。相反,它暗示了调节NADH转移速率的酶之间的直接相互作用。因此,与Chock和Gutfreund的结论相反,我们所有的实验数据都迫使我们再次提出NADH在α-GDH和LDH的位点之间直接转移。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号