首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Preventing Chronic Disease >Peer Reviewed: Using Empirical Bayes Methods to Rank Counties on Population Health Measures
【2h】

Peer Reviewed: Using Empirical Bayes Methods to Rank Counties on Population Health Measures

机译:同行评审:使用经验贝叶斯方法对人口健康措施的县进行排名

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute has published County Health Rankings (The Rankings) since 2010. These rankings use population-based data to highlight variation in health and encourage health assessment for all US counties. However, the uncertainty of estimates remains a limitation. We sought to quantify the precision of The Rankings for selected measures. We developed hierarchical models for 5 health outcome measures and applied empirical Bayes methods to obtain county rank estimates for a composite health outcome measure. We compared results using models with and without demographic fixed effects to determine whether covariates improved rank precision. Counties whose rank had wide confidence intervals had smaller populations or ranked in the middle of all counties for health outcomes. Incorporating covariates in the models produced narrower intervals, but rank estimates remained imprecise for many counties. Local health officials, especially in smaller population and mid-performing communities, should consider these limitations when interpreting the results of The Rankings.
机译:威斯康星大学人口健康研究所自2010年以来发布了“县健康排名”。但是,估计的不确定性仍然是一个限制。我们试图量化所选指标的排名精度。我们开发了5种健康结局指标的分层模型,并应用了经验贝叶斯方法来获得县级综合健康结局指标的估计值。我们比较了使用有无人口统计固定效应的模型的结果,以确定协变量是否提高了排名精度。信度区间较大的县的人口较少,或所有县的健康结果排名在中间。在模型中纳入协变量会产生较窄的区间,但许多县的等级估计仍不准确。当地卫生官员,特别是人口较少和中产阶级社区的地方卫生官员,在解释排名结果时应考虑这些限制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号