首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Plant Physiology >Two Types of Ventilated Porometers Compared on Broadleaf and Coniferous Species
【2h】

Two Types of Ventilated Porometers Compared on Broadleaf and Coniferous Species

机译:阔叶和针叶树种的两种通气孔率计的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Two ventilated porometers (diffusion and steady-state) were compared on four broadleaf and five coniferous species. The diffusion porometer gave consistently lower conductance values for both types of species, reflecting a direct stomatal response to low chamber humidity. At high conductance values, the porometers produced a linear and nearly equal response, but the diffusion porometer was less sensitive at low conductance values. This was due to lower air flow (20% of the velocity in the steady-state porometer) and water vapor sorption (by its acrylic plastic chamber). The broadleaf species had less variation (R2 = 0.81) than did the coniferous species (R2 = 0.61), but, with the latter, there was better correspondence between the two porometers, possibly due to sampling technique. Conductance values were clustered by species.
机译:在四个阔叶和五个针叶树种上比较了两个通风孔度计(扩散和稳态)。两种类型的物质的扩散孔率计始终提供较低的电导值,反映出气孔对低室湿度的直接响应。在高电导率值下,孔隙率计产生线性且几乎相等的响应,但在低电导率值下,扩散孔率计灵敏度较低。这是由于较低的空气流量(稳态孔隙率计中速度的20%)和水蒸气吸附(通过其丙烯酸塑料腔室)引起的。阔叶树种的变化(R 2 = 0.81)比针叶树种(R 2 = 0.61)少,但是与后者相比,两者之间的对应关系更好。两个孔度计,可能是由于采样技术所致。电导值按物种聚类。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号