首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Plant Physiology >Response of Leaf Water Potential Stomatal Resistance and Leaf Rolling to Water Stress
【2h】

Response of Leaf Water Potential Stomatal Resistance and Leaf Rolling to Water Stress

机译:叶片水势气孔阻力和叶片滚动对水分胁迫的响应

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Numerous studies have associated increased stomatal resistance with response to water deficit in cereals. However, consideration of change in leaf form seems to have been neglected. The response of adaxial and abaxial stomatal resistance and leaf rolling in rice to decreasing leaf water potential was investigated. Two rice cultivars were subjected to control and water stress treatments in a deep (1-meter) aerobic soil. Concurrent measurements of leaf water potential, stomatal resistance, and degree of leaf rolling were made through a 29-day period after cessation of irrigation. Kinandang Patong, an upland adapted cultivar, maintained higher dawn and midday leaf water potential than IR28, a hybrid selected in irrigated conditions. This was not explained by differences in leaf diffusive resistance or leaf rolling, and is assumed to result from a difference in root system extent.Stomatal resistance increased more on the abaxial than the adaxial leaf surface in both cultivars. This was associated with a change in leaf form or rolling inward of the upper leaf surface. Both responses, increased stomatal resistance and leaf rolling, were initiated in a similar leaf water potential range (−8 to −12 bars). Leaves of IR28 became fully rolled at leaf water potential of about −22 bars; however, total leaf diffusive resistance was only about 4 to 5 seconds per centimeter (conductance 0.25 to 0.2 centimeter per second) at that stage. Leaf diffusive resistance and degree of leaf rolling were linearly related to leaf water potential. Thus, leaf rolling in rice may be used as an estimate of the other two less obvious effects of water deficit.
机译:许多研究已将增加的气孔抗性与谷物对水分缺乏的反应联系起来。但是,似乎没有考虑改变叶片的形状。研究了水稻叶片的正面和背面气孔阻力和叶片滚动对降低叶片水势的响应。在深(1米)的需氧土壤中对两个水稻品种进行了对照和水分胁迫处理。在停止灌溉后的29天中,同时测量叶片的水势,气孔阻力和叶片的卷曲程度。 Kinandang Patong是一种适应旱地的品种,与在灌溉条件下选择的杂交品种IR28相比,其黎明和中午的叶片水势保持较高。这不能通过叶片扩散阻力或叶片滚动的差异来解释,并且被认为是由根系范围的差异引起的。在两个品种中,背面叶片的气孔阻力大于叶片正面的气孔阻力。这与叶片形态的改变或叶片上部表面向内滚动有关。在相似的叶片水势范围(-8至-12 bar)中都开始了增加气孔阻力和叶片滚动的两种反应。 IR28的叶片在约22 bar的叶片水势下完全卷曲;但是,在该阶段,叶片的总扩散阻力仅为每厘米4至5秒(电导为每秒0.25至0.2厘米)。叶片的扩散阻力和叶片的卷曲程度与叶片的水势线性相关。因此,水稻叶片的滚动可以用作对水缺乏的另外两个不太明显的影响的估计。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号