首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Philosophy Ethics and Humanities in Medicine : PEHM >No departure to Pandora? Using critical phenomenology to differentiate naive from reflective experience in psychiatry and psychosomatic medicine (A comment on Schwartz and Wiggins 2010)
【2h】

No departure to Pandora? Using critical phenomenology to differentiate naive from reflective experience in psychiatry and psychosomatic medicine (A comment on Schwartz and Wiggins 2010)

机译:没有离开 Pandora吗?利用批判现象学来区分精神病学和心身医学方面的天真与反思经验(对Schwartz和Wiggins的评论2010年)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The mind-body problem lies at the heart of the clinical practice of both psychiatry and psychosomatic medicine. In their recent publication, Schwartz and Wiggins address the question of how to understand life as central to the mind-body problem. Drawing on their own use of the phenomenological method, we propose that the mind-body problem is not resolved by a general, evocative appeal to an all encompassing life-concept, but rather falters precisely at the insurmountable difference between "natural" and a "reflective" experience built into phenomenological method itself. Drawing on the works of phenomenologically oriented thinkers, we describe life as inherently "teleological" without collapsing life with our subjective perspective, or stepping over our epistemological limits. From the phenomenology it can be demonstrated that the hypothetical teleological qualities are a reflective reconstruction modelled on human behavioural structure.
机译:身心问题是精神病学和心身医学的临床实践的核心。 Schwartz和Wiggins在最近的出版物中谈到了如何将生命理解为身心问题的核心问题。我们建议利用他们自己的现象学方法,不能通过对所有包含生命概念的一般性唤起性诉求来解决身心问题,而恰恰是因为“自然”与“自然”之间不可逾越的差异而动摇了。现象学方法本身内置的“反思”体验。借助面向现象学的思想家的著作,我们将生命描述为固有的“思想上的”,而不会以我们的主观视角使生活崩溃,也不会超越我们的认识论极限。从现象学上可以证明,假设的目的论品质是一种以人类行为结构为模型的反思性重构。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号