首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Philosophy Ethics and Humanities in Medicine : PEHM >Principlism medical individualism and health promotion in resource-poor countries: can autonomy-based bioethics promote social justice and population health?
【2h】

Principlism medical individualism and health promotion in resource-poor countries: can autonomy-based bioethics promote social justice and population health?

机译:资源贫乏国家的原则主义医学个人主义和健康促进:基于自主的生物伦理学可以促进社会正义和人口健康吗?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Through its adoption of the biomedical model of disease which promotes medical individualism and its reliance on the individual-based anthropology, mainstream bioethics has predominantly focused on respect for autonomy in the clinical setting and respect for person in the research site, emphasizing self-determination and freedom of choice. However, the emphasis on the individual has often led to moral vacuum, exaggeration of human agency, and a thin (liberal?) conception of justice. Applied to resource-poor countries and communities within developed countries, autonomy-based bioethics fails to address the root causes of diseases and public health crises with which individuals or communities are confronted. A sociological explanation of disease causation is needed to broaden principles of biomedical ethics and provides a renewed understanding of disease, freedom, medical practice, patient-physician relationship, risk and benefit of research and treatment, research priorities, and health policy.
机译:通过采用促进医学个人主义的疾病生物医学模型及其对基于个体的人类学的依赖,主流生物伦理学主要侧重于在临床环境中尊重自主权和在研究场所尊重人,强调自我决定和选择的自由。但是,对个人的强调常常导致道德上的真空,对人的代理权的夸大以及对正义的狭((自由主义)观念。基于自治的生物伦理学被应用于发达国家中资源匮乏的国家和社区,无法解决个人或社区所面临的疾病和公共卫生危机的根本原因。需要疾病因果关系的社会学解释,以扩大生物医学伦理学的原理,并提供对疾病,自由,医学实践,医患关系,研究和治疗的风险和收益,研究重点和健康政策的重新认识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号