首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Neurointervention >Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Endovascular Coiling versus Neurosurgical Clipping for Intracranial Aneurysms in Republic of Korea
【2h】

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Endovascular Coiling versus Neurosurgical Clipping for Intracranial Aneurysms in Republic of Korea

机译:大韩民国颅内动脉瘤的血管内螺旋成形术与神经外科钳夹术的成本-效果分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

PurposeThe International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) revealed that in ruptured intracranial aneurysms (RA), endovascular coiling (EC) yields better clinical outcomes than neurosurgical clipping (NC) at 1 year. In unruptured aneurysms (UIA), EC is being increasingly used as an alternative to NC due to patients' preference. There is a lot of difference in treatment cost (EC vs. NC) between countries. There is one recently published study dealing with the comparative cost analysis only in UIAs in South Korea. But it is a hospital-based study. So, the authors performed a nation-wide cost effective comparison in our country.
机译:目的国际蛛网膜下腔动脉瘤试验(ISAT)显示,在颅内动脉瘤破裂(RA)中,血管内卷曲(EC)在1年时的临床疗效优于神经外科钳夹(NC)。在未破裂的动脉瘤(UIA)中,由于患者的喜好,EC被越来越多地用作NC的替代药物。各国之间的治疗费用(EC与NC)存在很大差异。最近发表的一项研究仅在韩国的UIA中处理比较成本分析。但这是一项基于医院的研究。因此,作者在我国进行了全国范围内具有成本效益的比较。

著录项

代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号