首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Neuro-Oncology >P18.12 Patient-reported outcome measures and health-related quality of life in patients who undergo an intervention for brain metastases: a systematic review
【2h】

P18.12 Patient-reported outcome measures and health-related quality of life in patients who undergo an intervention for brain metastases: a systematic review

机译:P18.12接受脑转移瘤干预的患者报告的结局指标和与健康相关的生活质量:系统评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Introduction: Historically, outcome measures of neurosurgical or radiotherapeutic intervention for brain metastases have focused on overall or progression free survival, but understanding patient-reported outcomes and health-related quality of life has become increasingly important. Rates of brain metastases have risen due to lengthened life expectancies in patients with systemic cancer and better detection with improved imaging modalities. Brain metastases are reported in 20-40% of patients with systemic cancers and are associated with reduced quality of life and shortened life expectancy. A variety of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have been employed to assess the effect of therapy on quality of life in this population. Here, we review all PROMs relevant to patients with brain metastases. >Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Selected studies reported outcomes on brain metastasis patients treated with neurosurgical intervention, whole brain radiation therapy, or stereotactic radiotherapy. Patient-reported data on health related quality of life were extracted from the studies that met the inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis was not performed due to the heterogeneity in health-related quality of life metrics. >Results: From our search we identified 2526 articles. We included 177 full text articles after the initial screening. The methods and instruments used to assess health-related quality of life in patients treated for brain metastases were heterogeneous. In addition to the physical effects of the disease itself, the psychological implications of the diagnosis and the neurologic effects of treatment were major contributors to the reduced quality of life in these patients. >Conclusion: There is a lack of PROMs specific for brain metastasis patients, yet an understanding of quality of life outcomes in these patients can be useful to clinicians in informing goal-directed care discussions. Therefore, future research on neurosurgical or radiotherapeutic interventions for brain metastasis should focus not only on survival-ship but also on indicators of life quality and patient-reported outcomes. Clinicians should continue to incorporate quality of life outcomes in their discussion with patients about therapeutic options for brain metastases.
机译:>简介:从历史上看,神经外科手术或放射治疗干预脑转移的结局指标主要集中于总体或无进展生存期,但了解患者报告的结局和与健康相关的生活质量变得越来越重要。由于系统性癌症患者的预期寿命延长以及通过改进的成像方式进行更好的检测,导致脑转移率上升。据报道,有20-40%的系统性癌症患者发生脑转移,并与生活质量下降和预期寿命缩短有关。已经采用了多种患者报告的结局指标(PROM)来评估治疗对该人群生活质量的影响。在这里,我们回顾了所有与脑转移患者有关的PROM。 >方法:根据PRISMA指南,使用PubMed,Embase和Cochrane数据库对文献进行了系统的综述。某些研究报告了接受神经外科手术,全脑放射治疗或立体定向放射治疗的脑转移患者的结局。从符合入选标准的研究中提取患者报告的健康相关生活质量数据。由于健康相关生活质量指标的异质性,因此未执行元分析。 >结果:通过搜索,我们找到了2526篇文章。初步筛选后,我们收录了177条全文文章。用于评估接受脑转移治疗的患者与健康相关的生活质量的方法和手段是多种多样的。除了疾病本身的物理作用外,诊断的心理影响和治疗的神经系统作用也是导致这些患者生活质量下降的主要原因。 >结论:缺少针对脑转移患者的PROM,但是了解这些患者的生活质量可能有助于临床医生进行目标明确的护理讨论。因此,关于脑转移的神经外科或放射治疗干预的未来研究不仅应着眼于生存率,而且应着重于生活质量和患者报告的结局指标。临床医生应在与患者就脑转移的治疗选择进行的讨论中继续考虑生活质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号