首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Microbiology Biology Education >Finding Some Good in an Invasive Species: Introduction and Assessment of a Novel CURE to Improve Experimental Design in Undergraduate Biology Classrooms
【2h】

Finding Some Good in an Invasive Species: Introduction and Assessment of a Novel CURE to Improve Experimental Design in Undergraduate Biology Classrooms

机译:在外来入侵物种中找到一些好的东西:一种新型的CURE的介绍和评估以改善本科生生物学课堂的实验设计

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Reports such as Vision and Change in Undergraduate Biology Education call for integration of course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) into biology curricula and less emphasis on “cookbook” laboratories. CUREs, often characterized by a single open-ended research question, allow students to develop hypotheses, design experiments, and collaborate with peers. Conversely, “cookbook” labs incentivize task completion and have pre-determined experimental outcomes. While research comparing CUREs and “cookbook” labs is growing, there are fewer comparisons among CUREs. Here, we present a novel CURE built around an invasive grass, Bromus inermis. We evaluated this CURE’s effectiveness in improving students’ understanding of the Vision and Change competency relating to the application of the scientific process through development and testing of hypotheses. We did so by comparing changes in pre- and posttest scores on the Experimental Design Ability Test (EDAT) between Brome CURE students and students in a concurrent CURE, SEA-PHAGES. While students in both CUREs showed improvements at the end of the semester, Brome CURE students showed a greater increase in EDAT scores than did SEA-PHAGES CURE students. Additionally, Brome CURE students had significantly higher gains in 6 of the 10 EDAT criteria. We conclude that the Brome CURE is an effective ecological parallel to the SEA-PHAGES CURE and can help students gain a meaningful understanding of Vision and Change competencies. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
机译:诸如《本科生生物学教育的远景与变化》等报告要求将基于课程的本科生研究经验(CURE)整合到生物学课程中,而不是强调“食谱”实验室。 CURE通常以一个不限成员名额的研究性问题为特征,使学生能够发展假设,设计实验并与同伴合作。相反,“菜谱”实验室可激励任务完成并具有预定的实验结果。虽然比较CURE和“菜谱”实验室的研究正在增长,但CURE之间的比较却很少。在这里,我们介绍了一种新型的CURE,它围绕有入侵性的无花果布鲁姆草构建。我们评估了该CURE在通过发展和检验假设来提高学生对与科学过程的应用相关的愿景和变革能力的理解方面的有效性。我们通过比较Brome CURE学生和同时进行的CURE SEA-PHAGES学生的实验设计能力测试(EDAT)的测试前和测试后分数的变化来做到这一点。虽然两个CURE的学生在学期末都表现出了进步,但Brome CURE的学生在EDAT分数上的提高比SEA-PHAGES CURE的学生要大。此外,Brome CURE学生在10个EDAT标准中有6个获得了显着提高。我们得出的结论是,Brome CURE是与SEA-PHAGES CURE并行的有效生态系统,可以帮助学生对愿景和变革能力获得有意义的理解。微生物与生物教育杂志

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号