首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Membranes >Comparison of NF-RO and RO-NF for the Treatment of Mature Landfill Leachates: A Guide for Landfill Operators
【2h】

Comparison of NF-RO and RO-NF for the Treatment of Mature Landfill Leachates: A Guide for Landfill Operators

机译:NF-RO和RO-NF处理成熟垃圾渗滤液的比较:垃圾填埋场运营商指南

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Reverse osmosis (RO) and nanofiltration (NF) are among the state-of-the-art technologies for treating landfill leachates. Due to the complexity and variance in the composition of leachates, numerous combinations of multiple technologies are used for their treatment. One process chain for the treatment of raw leachate is RO followed by further concentration of RO-retentate using NF (RO-NF scheme). The aptness of this process train used by some landfill sites around the world (usually with the aim of volume reduction so as to re-inject the concentrate into the landfill) is questionable. This study investigated two schemes RO-NF and NF-RO (nanofiltration of raw leachate followed by reverse osmosis of NF permeate) to identify their merits/demerits. Experiments were conducted in bench scale using commercial membranes: DOW Filmtec NF270 and SW30HR. Filtration trials were performed at different pressures to compare the water and solute transports in the individual stages of the two schemes. Based on the water fluxes and compositions of retentates and permeates; osmotic pressures, energy demands, and other possible operational advantages were discussed. NF-RO offers some advantages and flexibility for leachate treatment besides being energy efficient compared to RO-NF, wherein osmotic pressure steadily increases during operation in turn increasing operation and maintenance costs.
机译:反渗透(RO)和纳米过滤(NF)是处理垃圾渗滤液的最新技术。由于渗滤液组成的复杂性和差异性,多种技术的多种组合被用于处理。 RO处理原始渗滤液的一个过程链是RO,然后使用NF(RO-NF方案)进一步浓缩RO截留液。全世界一些垃圾填埋场使用的这种工艺流程的适用性(通常是为了减少体积以便将浓缩物重新注入垃圾填埋场)是令人怀疑的。这项研究调查了两种方案RO-NF和NF-RO(先对渗滤液进行纳滤,然后对NF渗透液进行反渗透)以识别其优缺点。实验使用工业膜:DOW Filmtec NF270和SW30HR在实验室进行。在不同压力下进行过滤试验,以比较两种方案各个阶段的水和溶质运移。基于水的通量以及渗余物和渗透物的组成;讨论了渗透压,能量需​​求和其他可能的操作优势。与RO-NF相比,NF-RO除具有能源效率外,还为渗滤液的处理提供了一些优势和灵活性,其中渗透压在运行过程中稳定增加,从而增加了运行和维护成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号