首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Medicina >Evaluation of the Second Follicular Wave Phenomenon in Natural Cycle Assisted Reproduction: A Key Option for Poor Responders through Luteal Phase Oocyte Retrieval
【2h】

Evaluation of the Second Follicular Wave Phenomenon in Natural Cycle Assisted Reproduction: A Key Option for Poor Responders through Luteal Phase Oocyte Retrieval

机译:自然周期辅助繁殖中的第二个卵泡波现象的评估:通过黄体期卵母细胞检索对不良反应者的一个关键选择

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Emergence of Luteal Phase Oocyte Retrieval (LuPOR) may revolutionize the practice regarding the time-sensitive nature of poor responders ascertaining a higher number of oocytes, in a shorter amount of time. This may be especially important in view of employing the approach of natural cycles for Poor Responders. We suggest the acronym LuPOR describing the clinical practice of luteal phase oocyte retrieval. The aim of the study is to offer insight regarding the identity of LuPOR, and highlight how this practice may improve management of the special subgroup of poor responders. Materials and Methods: The present retrospective observational clinical study includes the collection and statistical analysis of data from 136 poor responders who underwent follicular oocyte retrieval (FoPOR) and subsequent LuPOR in natural cycles, during their In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) treatment, from the time period of 2015 to 2018. All 136 participants were diagnosed with poor ovarian reserve (POR) according to Bologna criteria. The 272 cycles were categorized as follows: 136 natural cycles with only FoPORs (Control Group) and 136 natural cycles including both FoPORs and LuPORs. Results: Our primary results indicate no statistically significant differences with regards to the mean number of oocytes, the maturation status, and fertilization rate between FoPOR and LuPOR in natural cycles. Secondarily, we demonstrate a statistically significant higher yield of oocytes (2.50 ± 0.78 vs. 1.25 ± 0.53), better oocyte maturity status (1.93 ± 0.69 vs. 0.95 ± 0.59) and higher fertilization rate (1.31 ± 0.87 vs. 0.61 ± 0.60) in natural cycles including both FoPOR and LuPOR, when compared to cycles including only FoPOR. Conclusion: Our study may contribute towards the establishment of an efficient poor responders’ management through the natural cycle approach, paving a novel clinical practice and ascertaining the opportunity to employ oocytes and embryos originating from a luteal phase follicular wave.
机译:背景:黄体期卵母细胞检索(LuPOR)的出现可能会改变有关在较短的时间内确定更多卵母细胞的不良反应者对时间敏感的性质的实践。考虑到对不良响应者采用自然循环的方法,这一点尤其重要。我们建议使用首字母缩写词LuPOR描述黄体期卵母细胞取回的临床实践。这项研究的目的是提供有关LuPOR身份的见解,并强调这种做法如何改善对反应较弱的特殊人群的管理。材料和方法:本回顾性观察性临床研究包括从136个不良反应者收集数据并对其进行统计分析,这些反应者从那时开始在体外受精(IVF)治疗期间经历了自然周期的卵泡卵母细胞检索(FoPOR)和随后的LuPOR期间为2015年至2018年。根据博洛尼亚标准,所有136名参与者均被诊断为卵巢储备不足(POR)。 272个周期的分类如下:仅有FoPOR的136个自然周期(对照组)和包括FoPOR和LuPOR的136个自然周期。结果:我们的主要结果表明,在自然周期中,FoPOR和LuPOR之间的卵母细胞平均数量,成熟状态和受精率没有统计学上的显着差异。其次,我们证明卵母细胞的产量具有统计学上的显着提高(2.50±0.78 vs. 1.25±0.53),更好的卵母细胞成熟度状态(1.93±0.69 vs. 0.95±0.59)和较高的受精率(1.31±0.87 vs. 0.61±0.60)与仅包含FoPOR的循环相比,包括FoPOR和LuPOR的自然循环中。结论:我们的研究可能有助于通过自然循环方法建立有效的不良反应者管理,为新型临床实践铺平道路,并确定利用黄体期卵泡波卵母细胞和胚胎的机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号