首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Scientifica >Core Muscle Activity Exercise Preference and Perceived Exertion during Core Exercise with Elastic Resistance versus Machine
【2h】

Core Muscle Activity Exercise Preference and Perceived Exertion during Core Exercise with Elastic Resistance versus Machine

机译:核心抵抗力与机器的核心锻炼过程中的核心肌肉活动锻炼偏好和感知的运动

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objectives. To investigate core muscle activity, exercise preferences, and perceived exertion during two selected core exercises performed with elastic resistance versus a conventional training machine. Methods. 17 untrained men aged 26–67 years participated in surface electromyography (EMG) measurements of five core muscles during torso-twists performed from left to right with elastic resistance and in the machine, respectively. The order of the exercises was randomized and each exercise consisted of 3 repetitions performed at a 10 RM load. EMG amplitude was normalized (nEMG) to maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVC). Results. A higher right erector spinae activity in the elastic exercise compared with the machine exercise (50% [95% CI 36–64] versus 32% [95% CI 18–46] nEMG) was found. By contrast, the machine exercise, compared with the elastic exercise, showed higher left external oblique activity (77% [95% CI 64–90] versus 54% [95% CI 40–67] nEMG). For the rectus abdominis, right external oblique, and left erector spinae muscles there were no significant differences. Furthermore, 76% preferred the torso-twist with elastic resistance over the machine exercise. Perceived exertion (Borg CR10) was not significantly different between machine (5.8 [95% CI 4.88–6.72]) and elastic exercise (5.7 [95% CI 4.81–6.59]). Conclusion. Torso-twists using elastic resistance showed higher activity of the erector spinae, whereas torso-twist in the machine resulted in higher activity of the external oblique. For the remaining core muscles the two training modalities induced similar muscular activation. In spite of similar perceived exertion the majority of the participants preferred the exercise using elastic resistance.
机译:目标。为了研究与常规训练机相比在使用弹性阻力进行的两次选定的核心锻炼中的核心肌肉活动,锻炼偏好和感知的运动。方法。 17名年龄在26-67岁之间的未经训练的男性分别在左手和右手通过弹性阻力进行的扭腰扭蛋中和机器中参加了五次核心肌肉的表面肌电图(EMG)测量。练习的顺序是随机的,每个练习包括10次RM负荷下的3次重复。 EMG振幅被标准化(nEMG)到最大自愿等距收缩(MVC)。结果。与机械锻炼相比,发现弹性锻炼中的右竖脊肌活动更高(50%[95%CI 36-64]对32%[95%CI 18-46] nEMG)。相比之下,与弹性锻炼相比,机器锻炼显示出较高的左外斜肌活动(nEMG为77%[95%CI 64-90],而54%[95%CI 40-67])。对于腹直肌,右外斜肌和左竖脊肌没有显着差异。此外,有76%的人喜欢具有弹性阻力的躯干扭转器而不是机器锻炼器。机器(5.8 [95%CI 4.88–6.72])和弹性运动(5.7 [95%CI 4.81–6.59])之间的感知劳累力(Borg CR10)没有显着差异。结论。使用弹性阻力的躯干扭转者表现出竖脊肌较高的活动性,而器械中的躯干扭转者导致外斜肌的活动性较高。对于其余的核心肌肉,这两种训练方式可引起相似的肌肉激活。尽管感觉到类似的劳累,但大多数参与者还是喜欢使用弹性阻力进行锻炼。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号