首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Computational Biology >Messages Do Diffuse Faster than Messengers: Reconciling Disparate Estimates of the Morphogen Bicoid Diffusion Coefficient
【2h】

Messages Do Diffuse Faster than Messengers: Reconciling Disparate Estimates of the Morphogen Bicoid Diffusion Coefficient

机译:消息的传播速度比使者快:调和不同的估算态的双生双曲线形扩散系数

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The gradient of Bicoid (Bcd) is key for the establishment of the anterior-posterior axis in Drosophila embryos. The gradient properties are compatible with the SDD model in which Bcd is synthesized at the anterior pole and then diffuses into the embryo and is degraded with a characteristic time. Within this model, the Bcd diffusion coefficient is critical to set the timescale of gradient formation. This coefficient has been measured using two optical techniques, Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching (>FRAP) and Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy (>FCS), obtaining estimates in which the >FCS value is an order of magnitude larger than the >FRAP one. This discrepancy raises the following questions: which estimate is "correct''; what is the reason for the disparity; and can the SDD model explain Bcd gradient formation within the experimentally observed times? In this paper, we use a simple biophysical model in which Bcd diffuses and interacts with binding sites to show that both the >FRAP and the >FCS estimates may be correct and compatible with the observed timescale of gradient formation. The discrepancy arises from the fact that >FCS and >FRAP report on different effective (concentration dependent) diffusion coefficients, one of which describes the spreading rate of the individual Bcd molecules (the messengers) and the other one that of their concentration (the message). The latter is the one that is more relevant for the gradient establishment and is compatible with its formation within the experimentally observed times.
机译:Bicoid(Bcd)的梯度是果蝇胚胎前后轴建立的关键。梯度特性与SDD模型兼容,在SDD模型中,Bcd在前极合成,然后扩散到胚胎中并随特征时间降解。在此模型中,Bcd扩散系数对于设置梯度形成的时间尺度至关重要。该系数已使用两种光学技术进行了测量:光漂白后的荧光恢复(> FRAP )和荧光相关光谱法(> FCS ),获得了其中> FCS 值比> FRAP 值大一个数量级。这种差异提出了以下问题:哪个估计是“正确的”;差异的原因是什么;并且SDD模型能否解释在实验观察时间内的Bcd梯度形成?在本文中,我们使用一个简单的生物物理模型,其中Bcd扩散并与结合位点相互作用,表明> FRAP 和> FCS 估计可能是正确的,并且与观察到的梯度形成时间尺度相符。 > FCS 和> FRAP 报告了不同的有效(浓度依赖性)扩散系数,其中一个描述单个Bcd分子(信使)的扩散速率,另一个描述后者是与梯度建立更相关且与在实验观察时间内其形成兼容的一种。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号