首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Biology >One Health or Three? Publication Silos Among the One Health Disciplines
【2h】

One Health or Three? Publication Silos Among the One Health Disciplines

机译:一个健康还是三个?一个卫生学科中的出版物孤岛

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The One Health initiative is a global effort fostering interdisciplinary collaborations to address challenges in human, animal, and environmental health. While One Health has received considerable press, its benefits remain unclear because its effects have not been quantitatively described. We systematically surveyed the published literature and used social network analysis to measure interdisciplinarity in One Health studies constructing dynamic pathogen transmission models. The number of publications fulfilling our search criteria increased by 14.6% per year, which is faster than growth rates for life sciences as a whole and for most biology subdisciplines. Surveyed publications clustered into three communities: one used by ecologists, one used by veterinarians, and a third diverse-authorship community used by population biologists, mathematicians, epidemiologists, and experts in human health. Overlap between these communities increased through time in terms of author number, diversity of co-author affiliations, and diversity of citations. However, communities continue to differ in the systems studied, questions asked, and methods employed. While the infectious disease research community has made significant progress toward integrating its participating disciplines, some segregation—especially along the veterinary/ecological research interface—remains.
机译:“一个健康”倡议是一项全球努力,旨在促进跨学科合作,以应对人类,动物和环境健康方面的挑战。尽管One Health已获得相当多的媒体报道,但其益处尚不清楚,因为尚未对其疗效进行定量描述。我们系统地调查了已发表的文献,并使用社交网络分析来测量在构建动态病原体传播模型的一项健康研究中的学科交叉性。符合搜索条件的出版物数量每年以14.6%的速度增长,快于整个生命科学领域和大多数生物学子学科的增长率。被调查的出版物分为三个社区:一个由生态学家使用,一个由兽医使用,以及第三个由不同的作者社区由人口生物学家,数学家,流行病学家和人类健康专家使用。随着时间的流逝,这些社区之间的重叠在作者数量,合著者隶属关系的多样性以及引文的多样性方面都在增加。但是,社区在所研究的系统,提出的问题和采用的方法方面继续存在差异。尽管传染病研究界在整合其参与学科方面取得了重大进展,但仍存在一些隔离,尤其是在兽医/生态学研究的界面上。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号