首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Clinical Medicine Research >PS3-14: Primary Care Providers Reported Use of Pre-Screening Discussions for Prostate Cancer Screening: A Cross-Sectional Survey
【2h】

PS3-14: Primary Care Providers Reported Use of Pre-Screening Discussions for Prostate Cancer Screening: A Cross-Sectional Survey

机译:PS3-14:基层医疗服务提供者报告了对前列腺癌筛查的筛查前讨论的使用:一项跨部门调查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background and Aims: There is no scientific consensus for routine prostate cancer screening for men of average risk less than 75 years of age using the prostate-specific antigen test (PSA). However, suggested practice is for physicians to discuss the known harms and potential benefits of PSA testing and digital rectal exam (DRE) with their patients. We conducted a survey of primary care providers (PCPs) to determine their practice styles including discussion regarding prostate cancer screening; we also conducted a patient survey to learn whether their PCPs discussed PSA testing and DRE during a health maintenance exam (HME).>Methods: PCPs in the Lovelace Health System were surveyed about their prostate cancer screening practices for average risk men. Based on their responses, they were divided into two groups: class="enumerated" style="list-style-type:decimal">routine screeners (RS), those who routinely order PSA testing without discussing potential harms and benefits andinformed decision makers (IDM), those who routinely discuss the PSA test and its benefits and harms.After the HME, patients were surveyed as to whether or not their PCP discussed the PSA test and its harms and benefits during their visit.>Results: Among the physicians, 35.9% (23/64) were RS and 64.1% (41/64) were IDM. Of the RS patients, 82.3% (51/62) responded that their physician did discuss the PSA test compared to 71.2% (37/52) of the IDM patients (p=0.10). For RS, 58.8% (36/62) of the patients stated their provider initiated the discussion, whereas 56.8% (30/52) of the IDM initiated it. Provider recommendations to have the test were higher for the RS (80.3%) (41/51) compared to 53.1% (20/37) of the IDM p=.0032.>Conclusions: By patient report, a higher percentage of RS providers discussed the PSA test with patients. As would be expected, most of the RS recommended the PSA compared to only one-third of the IDM providers. Further studies are needed to determine what other factors of physician practice styles relate to discussing or not discussing prostate cancer screening with patients, and how patient-providers interactions influence screening communication.
机译:>背景和目标:对于使用前列腺特异性抗原测试(PSA)对平均风险低于75岁的男性进行常规前列腺癌筛查,目前尚无科学共识。但是,建议的做法是让医生与他们的患者讨论PSA测试和直肠指检(DRE)的已知危害和潜在好处。我们对初级保健提供者(PCP)进行了调查,以确定他们的执业方式,包括有关前列腺癌筛查的讨论;我们还进行了一项患者调查,以了解他们的PCP是否在健康维持考试(HME)期间讨论了PSA测试和DRE。>方法:对Lovelace Health System中的PCP进行了平均前列腺癌筛查实践调查冒险男人。根据他们的回答,他们分为两组: class =“ enumerated” style =“ list-style-type:decimal”> <!-list-behavior = enumerated prefix-word = mark-type = decimal max -label-size = 0-> 例行检查员(RS),那些通常在不讨论潜在危害和益处的情况下订购PSA测试的人,以及 知情的决策者(IDM),这些例行讨论PSA测试及其好处和危害。 在HME之后,对患者进行了调查,以了解他们的PCP在就诊期间是否讨论了PSA测试及其危害和益处。>结果:在医师中,RS占35.9%(23/64),IDM占64.1%(41/64)。在RS患者中,有82.3%(51/62)回答说他们的医师确实讨论了PSA测试,而IDM患者中有71.2%(37/52)(p = 0.10)。对于RS,有58.8%(36/62)的患者表示其提供者发起了讨论,而IDM的56.8%(30/52)则发起了讨论。提供者对RS进行检测的建议较高(80.3%)(41/51),而IDM则为53.1%(20/37)p = .0032。>结论:根据患者报告,较高比例的RS供应商与患者讨论了PSA测试。不出所料,大多数RS推荐PSA,而IDM提供商只有三分之一。需要进一步的研究来确定医师执业方式的哪些其他因素与与患者讨论或不讨论前列腺癌筛查有关,以及患者与提供者之间的相互作用如何影响筛查交流。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号