首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Linacre Quarterly >The Maternal Mortality Myth in the Context of Legalized Abortion
【2h】

The Maternal Mortality Myth in the Context of Legalized Abortion

机译:堕胎合法化背景下的孕产妇死亡神话

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

It was quoted recently in the literature that “The risk of death associated with childbirth is approximately 14 times higher than with abortion.” This statement is unsupported by the literature and there is no credible scientific basis to support it. A reasonable woman would find any discussion about the risk of dying from a procedure as material, i.e., important and significant. In order for the physician–patient informed consent dialogue to address this critical issue, the physician must rely upon objective and accurate information concerning abortion. There are numerous and complicated methodological factors that make a valid scientific assessment of abortion mortality extremely difficult. Among the many factors responsible are incomplete reporting, definitional incompatibilities, voluntary data collection, research bias, reliance upon estimations, political correctness, inaccurate and/or incomplete death certificate completion, incomparability with maternal mortality statistics, and failing to include other causes of death such as suicides. Given the importance of this disclosure about abortion mortality, the lack of credible and reliable scientific evidence supporting this representation requires substantial discussion.
机译:最近有文献援引“与分娩有关的死亡风险比堕胎高约14倍。”该说法没有文献支持,也没有可靠的科学依据来支持。一个有理智的女人会发现任何关于从程序中死亡的风险的讨论是重要的,重要的。为了使医患知情同意对话能够解决这个关键问题,医师必须依靠有关流产的客观而准确的信息。有许多复杂的方法学因素使得对流产死亡率进行有效的科学评估极为困难。造成影响的许多因素包括报告不完整,定义上的不兼容性,自愿数据收集,研究偏见,对估计的依赖,政治正确性,死亡证明的不准确和/或不完整,与产妇死亡率统计数据的可比性以及未能包括其他死亡原因,例如作为自杀。鉴于这种披露对堕胎死亡率的重要性,缺乏可靠和可靠的科学证据支持这种说法需要大量讨论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号