首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine >A Simulation Study Comparing Different Statistical Approaches for the Identification of Predictive Biomarkers
【2h】

A Simulation Study Comparing Different Statistical Approaches for the Identification of Predictive Biomarkers

机译:模拟研究比较不同统计方法对预测性生物标志物的鉴定

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Identification of relevant biomarkers that are associated with a treatment effect is one requirement for adequate treatment stratification and consequently to improve health care by administering the best available treatment to an individual patient. Various statistical approaches were proposed that allow assessing the interaction between a continuous covariate and treatment. Nevertheless, categorization of a continuous covariate, e.g., by splitting the data at the observed median value, appears to be very prevalent in practice. In this article, we present a simulation study considering data as observed in a randomized clinical trial with a time-to-event outcome performed to compare properties of such approaches, namely, Cox regression with linear interaction, Multivariable Fractional Polynomials for Interaction (MFPI), Local Partial-Likelihood Bootstrap (LPLB), and the Subpopulation Treatment Effect Pattern Plot (STEPP) method, and of strategies based on categorization of continuous covariates (splitting the covariate at the median, splitting at quartiles, and using an “optimal” split by maximizing a corresponding test statistic). In different scenarios with no interactions, linear interactions or nonlinear interactions, type I error probability and the power for detection of a true covariate-treatment interaction were estimated. The Cox regression approach was more efficient than the other methods for scenarios with monotonous interactions, especially when the number of observed events was small to moderate. When patterns of the biomarker-treatment interaction effect were more complex, MFPI and LPLB performed well compared to the other approaches. Categorization of data generally led to a loss of power, but for very complex patterns, splitting the data into multiple categories might help to explore the nature of the interaction effect. Consequently, we recommend application of statistical methods developed for assessment of interactions between continuous biomarkers and treatment instead of arbitrary or data-driven categorization of continuous covariates.
机译:鉴定与治疗效果相关的相关生物标志物是进行充分治疗分层的一项要求,因此需要通过对单个患者进行最佳治疗来改善医疗保健。提出了各种统计方法,这些方法可以评估连续协变量和治疗之间的相互作用。然而,在实践中,例如通过将数据拆分为观察到的中值对连续协变量进行分类似乎非常普遍。在本文中,我们提供了一项模拟研究,其中考虑了在随机临床试验中观察到的数据,并进行了事件发生时间的比较,以比较此类方法的特性,即Cox回归与线性相互作用,相互作用的多元分数多项式(MFPI) ,局部偏爱自举(LPLB)和亚种群治疗效果模式图(STEPP)方法,以及基于连续协变量分类的策略(将协变量拆分为中位数,拆分为四分位数,然后使用“最佳”拆分)通过最大化相应的测试统计信息)。在没有交互作用,线性交互作用或非线性交互作用的不同情况下,估计了I型错误概率和检测真正的协变量处理交互作用的能力。对于单调交互的场景,Cox回归方法比其他方法更有效,尤其是在观察到的事件数量小到中等的情况下。当生物标志物与药物相互作用的模式更为复杂时,与其他方法相比,MFPI和LPLB表现良好。数据分类通常会导致功耗下降,但是对于非常复杂的模式,将数据分为多个类别可能有助于探索交互作用的性质。因此,我们建议应用为评估连续生物标志物和治疗之间的相互作用而开发的统计方法,而不是对连续协变量进行任意或数据驱动的分类。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号