首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Endoscopy International Open >Analysis of microvascular density in early gastric carcinoma using magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging
【2h】

Analysis of microvascular density in early gastric carcinoma using magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging

机译:早期胃癌微血管密度的内镜放大与窄带成像分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background and study aims: Intramucosal vascular density differs between differentiated and undifferentiated type gastric carcinomas. This study aimed to evaluate the microvascular density characteristics of these two types of carcinoma using magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (ME-NBI). >Patients and methods: In total, 42 differentiated and 10 undifferentiated types were evaluated. The microvessels observed using ME-NBI were extracted from stored still images and the microvascular density in the two carcinoma types was analyzed. Histological vascular density in resected specimens was also evaluated using CD34 immunostaining. >Results: There were significant differences between the microvascular density in the differentiated and undifferentiated types of carcinoma (10.02 ± 4.72 % vs 4.02 ± 0.40 %; P < 0.001) using ME-NBI. Vascular density assessed histologically also differed significantly between differentiated and undifferentiated types in both the whole mucosal (5.81 ± 3.17 % vs 3.25 ± 1.21 %) and the superficial mucosal layers (0 – 100 μm) (6.38 ± 3.73 % vs 3.66 ± 1.46 %). However, the vascular density in the surrounding non-carcinomatous mucosa assessed using ME-NBI and histologically, was significantly lower in the differentiated than in the undifferentiated types (P < 0.001). There was good agreement between ME-NBI and histologically assessed microvascular density in both the whole (r = 0.740; P < 0.001) and superficial mucosal layers (r = 0.764; P < 0.001). White opaque substance (WOS) was seen in eight patients who had the differentiated type carcinoma. In almost all cases with WOS, the appearance of the carcinoma was discolored. >Conclusions: There was a close relationship between ME-NBI assessed microvascular density and histologically assessed vascular density in the mucosal layer. Microvascular density differed significantly between the differentiated and undifferentiated types of carcinoma assessed using ME-NBI.
机译:>背景和研究目的:分化型和未分化型胃癌的粘膜内血管密度不同。这项研究的目的是使用带窄带成像的放大内窥镜(ME-NBI)评估这两种类型的癌症的微血管密度特征。 >患者和方法:共评估了42种分化型和10种未分化型。从存储的静止图像中提取使用ME-NBI观察到的微血管,并分析两种癌症类型中的微血管密度。还使用CD34免疫染色评估了切除标本的组织学血管密度。 >结果:使用ME-NBI,在分化型和未分化型癌中,微血管密度之间存在显着差异(10.02%±4.72 %% vs 4.02%±0.40 %%; P <0.001)。组织学评估的血管密度在分化型和未分化型之间在整个粘膜(5.81±±3.17%vs 3.25±±1.21%)和浅层粘膜层(0±-100μm)(6.38±±3.73%vs 3.66±1.46%)之间也有显着差异。然而,用ME-NBI和组织学方法评估的周围非癌性粘膜的血管密度明显低于未分化型(P <0.001)。 ME-NBI与组织学评估的整个微血管密度(r = 0.740; P <0.001)和浅层黏膜层(r = 0.764; P <0.001)之间有很好的一致性。在八名患有分化型癌的患者中发现了白色不透明物质(WOS)。在几乎所有的WOS病例中,癌的外观都会变色。 >结论:ME-NBI评估的微血管密度与组织学评估的黏膜层血管密度之间存在密切关系。使用ME-NBI评估的分化型和未分化型癌症之间的微血管密度显着不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号