首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>eNeuro >Quantitative Evaluation in Estimating Sources Underlying Brain Oscillations Using Current Source Density Methods and Beamformer Approaches
【2h】

Quantitative Evaluation in Estimating Sources Underlying Brain Oscillations Using Current Source Density Methods and Beamformer Approaches

机译:使用电流源密度方法和Beamformer方法定量评估脑震荡源的定量评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Brain oscillations from EEG and MEG shed light on neurophysiological mechanisms of human behavior. However, to extract information on cortical processing, researchers have to rely on source localization methods that can be very broadly classified into current density estimates such as exact low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (eLORETA), minimum norm estimates (MNE), and beamformers such as dynamic imaging of coherent sources (DICS) and linearly constrained minimum variance (LCMV). These algorithms produce a distributed map of brain activity underlying sustained and transient responses during neuroimaging studies of behavior. On the other hand, there are very few comparative analyses that evaluates the “ground truth detection” capabilities of these methods. The current article evaluates the reliability in estimation of sources of spectral event generators in the cortex using a two-pronged approach. First, simulated EEG data with point dipoles and distributed dipoles are used to validate the accuracy and sensitivity of each one of these methods of source localization. The abilities of the techniques were tested by comparing the localization error, focal width, false positive (FP) ratios while detecting already known location of neural activity generators under varying signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs). Second, empirical EEG data during auditory steady state responses (ASSRs) in human participants were used to compare the distributed nature of source localization. All methods were successful in recovery of point sources in favorable signal to noise scenarios and could achieve high hit rates if FPs are ignored. Interestingly, focal activation map is generated by LCMV and DICS when compared to eLORETA while control of FPs is much superior in eLORETA. Subsequently drawbacks and strengths of each method are highlighted with a detailed discussion on how to choose a technique based on empirical requirements.
机译:脑电图和脑电图的脑震荡揭示了人类行为的神经生理机制。但是,要提取有关皮质加工的信息,研究人员必须依靠可广泛分类为当前密度估算值的源定位方法,例如精确的低分辨率脑电磁层析成像(eLORETA),最小范数估算值(MNE)和波束形成器等。作为相干源(DICS)和线性约束最小方差(LCMV)的动态成像。这些算法在行为的神经影像研究过程中产生了基于持续和短暂反应的大脑活动的分布式图。另一方面,很少有比较分析来评估这些方法的“地面真相检测”能力。当前文章使用两管齐下的方法评估了皮层中频谱事件生成器源估计的可靠性。首先,使用带有点偶极子和分布式偶极子的模拟EEG数据来验证这些源定位方法中的每一种方法的准确性和灵敏度。通过比较定位误差,焦距,假阳性(FP)比率,同时在变化的信噪比(SNR)下检测神经活动发生器的已知位置,来测试该技术的能力。其次,在人类参与者的听觉稳态响应(ASSR)过程中的经验性EEG数据用于比较源定位的分布式性质。所有方法都成功地在点信噪比良好的情况下恢复了点源,如果忽略FP,则可以实现较高的命中率。有趣的是,与eLORETA相比,LCMV和DICS生成了局部激活图,而FP的控制在eLORETA中要好得多。随后,通过详细讨论如何根据经验要求选择一种技术,突出了每种方法的缺点和优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号