首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Environmental Health Perspectives >Large effects from small exposures. I. Mechanisms for endocrine-disrupting chemicals with estrogenic activity.
【2h】

Large effects from small exposures. I. Mechanisms for endocrine-disrupting chemicals with estrogenic activity.

机译:小曝光大效果。 I.具有雌激素活性的破坏内分泌的化学物质的机制。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Information concerning the fundamental mechanisms of action of both natural and environmental hormones, combined with information concerning endogenous hormone concentrations, reveals how endocrine-disrupting chemicals with estrogenic activity (EEDCs) can be active at concentrations far below those currently being tested in toxicological studies. Using only very high doses in toxicological studies of EEDCs thus can dramatically underestimate bioactivity. Specifically: a) The hormonal action mechanisms and the physiology of delivery of EEDCs predict with accuracy the low-dose ranges of biological activity, which have been missed by traditional toxicological testing. b) Toxicology assumes that it is valid to extrapolate linearly from high doses over a very wide dose range to predict responses at doses within the physiological range of receptor occupancy for an EEDC; however, because receptor-mediated responses saturate, this assumption is invalid. c) Furthermore, receptor-mediated responses can first increase and then decrease as dose increases, contradicting the assumption that dose-response relationships are monotonic. d) Exogenous estrogens modulate a system that is physiologically active and thus is already above threshold, contradicting the traditional toxicological assumption of thresholds for endocrine responses to EEDCs. These four fundamental issues are problematic for risk assessment methods used by regulatory agencies, because they challenge the traditional use of extrapolation from high-dose testing to predict responses at the much lower environmentally relevant doses. These doses are within the range of current exposures to numerous chemicals in wildlife and humans. These problems are exacerbated by the fact that the type of positive and negative controls appropriate to the study of endocrine responses are not part of traditional toxicological testing and are frequently omitted, or when present, have been misinterpreted.
机译:有关天然和环境激素的基本作用机理的信息,以及有关内源激素浓度的信息,揭示了具有雌激素活性(EEDCs)的破坏内分泌的化学物质在远低于目前在毒理学研究中测试的浓度下如何具有活性。因此,在EEDC的毒理学研究中仅使用非常高的剂量会大大低估生物活性。具体而言:a)EEDC的激素作用机制和生理传递准确预测了传统毒理学测试所忽略的低剂量生物活性。 b)毒理学假定从非常大的剂量范围内的高剂量线性推断以预测在EEDC受体占据的生理范围内的剂量下的反应是有效的;但是,由于受体介导的反应饱和,因此该假设无效。 c)此外,受体介导的反应可以先增加然后随剂量增加而减少,这与剂量反应关系是单调的假设相矛盾。 d)外源性雌激素调节一个系统,该系统具有生理活性,因此已经超过阈值,这与传统的毒理学假设(即对EEDC的内分泌反应的阈值)相矛盾。对于管理机构使用的风险评估方法,这四个基本问题是有问题的,因为它们对传统的大剂量检测外推方法提出挑战,以预测在低得多的环境相关剂量下的反应。这些剂量在当前暴露于野生动植物和人类中多种化学药品的范围内。适用于内分泌反应研究的阳性和阴性对照的类型不是传统毒理学测试的一部分,并且经常被忽略或存在时被误解的事实使这些问题更加恶化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号