首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Environmental Health Perspectives >Combining community-based research and local knowledge to confront asthma and subsistence-fishing hazards in Greenpoint/Williamsburg Brooklyn New York.
【2h】

Combining community-based research and local knowledge to confront asthma and subsistence-fishing hazards in Greenpoint/Williamsburg Brooklyn New York.

机译:在纽约布鲁克林的格林波特/威廉斯堡将基于社区的研究与当地知识相结合以应对哮喘和生存捕鱼的危害。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Activists in the environmental justice movement are challenging expert-driven scientific research by taking the research process into their own hands and speaking for themselves by defining, analyzing, and prescribing solutions for the environmental health hazards confronting communities of the poor and people of color. I highlight the work of El Puente and The Watchperson Project--two community-based organizations in the Greenpoint/Williamsburg neighborhood in Brooklyn, New York, that have engaged in community-based participatory research (CBPR) to address asthma and risks from subsistence-fish diets. The CBPR process aims to engage community members as equal partners alongside scientists in problem definition, information collection, and data analysis--all geared toward locally relevant action for social change. In the first case I highlight how El Puente has organized residents to conduct a series of asthma health surveys and tapped into local knowledge of the Latino population to understand potential asthma triggers and to devise culturally relevant health interventions. In a second case I follow The Watchperson Project and their work surveying subsistence anglers and note how the community-gathered information contributed key data inputs for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Cumulative Exposure Project in the neighborhood. In each case I review the processes each organization used to conduct CBPR, some of their findings, and the local knowledge they gathered, all of which were crucial for understanding and addressing local environmental health issues. I conclude with some observations about the benefits and limits of CBPR for helping scientists and communities pursue environmental justice.
机译:环境正义运动的积极分子通过将研究过程掌握在自己的手中,并通过定义,分析和规定针对穷人和有色人种所面临的环境健康危害的解决方案,为自己辩护,以挑战专家驱动的科学研究。我着重介绍El Puente和The Watchperson Project的工作-纽约布鲁克林Greenpoint / Williamsburg社区的两个社区组织,它们从事了基于社区的参与性研究(CBPR),以解决哮喘病和生存风险。鱼的饮食。 CBPR流程旨在让社区成员与科学家一道成为平等的伙伴,参与问题定义,信息收集和数据分析,所有这些工作都旨在针对当地的社会变革行动。在第一个案例中,我强调了El Puente如何组织居民进行一系列哮喘健康调查,并利用拉丁裔人口的当地知识来了解潜在的哮喘病诱因并制定与文化相关的健康干预措施。在第二个案例中,我关注了“守望者计划”及其对生存垂钓者进行调查的工作,并注意到社区收集的信息如何为附近的美国环境保护署累积暴露项目贡献了关键数据。在每种情况下,我都会审查每个组织进行CBPR的流程,他们的一些发现以及他们收集的当地知识,所有这些对于理解和解决当地环境健康问题都是至关重要的。最后,我对CBPR在帮助科学家和社区追求环境正义方面的好处和局限性发表了一些看法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号