首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Environmental Health >Openness in participation assessment and policy making upon issues of environment and environmental health: a review of literature and recent project results
【2h】

Openness in participation assessment and policy making upon issues of environment and environmental health: a review of literature and recent project results

机译:对环境和环境健康问题的参与评估和政策制定的开放性:文献综述和近期项目成果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Issues of environment and environmental health involve multiple interests regarding e.g. political, societal, economical, and public concerns represented by different kinds of organizations and individuals. Not surprisingly, stakeholder and public participation has become a major issue in environmental and environmental health policy and assessment. The need for participation has been discussed and reasoned by many, including environmental legislators around the world. In principle, participation is generally considered as desirable and the focus of most scholars and practitioners is on carrying out participation, and making participation more effective. In practice also doubts regarding the effectiveness and importance of participation exist among policy makers, assessors, and public, leading even to undermining participatory practices in policy making and assessment.There are many possible purposes for participation, and different possible models of interaction between assessment and policy. A solid conceptual understanding of the interrelations between participation, assessment, and policy making is necessary in order to design and implement effective participatory practices. In this paper we ask, do current common conceptions of assessment, policy making and participation provide a sufficient framework for achieving effective participation? This question is addresses by reviewing the range of approaches to participation in assessment and policy making upon issues of environment and environmental health and some related insights from recent research projects, INTARESE and BENERIS.Openness, considered e.g. in terms of a) scope of participation, b) access to information, c) scope of contribution, d) timing of openness, and e) impact of contribution, provides a new perspective to the relationships between participation, assessment and policy making. Participation, assessment, and policy making form an inherently intertwined complex with interrelated objectives and outcomes. Based on experiences from implementing openness, we suggest complete openness as the new default, deviation from which should be explicitly argued, in assessment and policy making upon issues of environment and environmental health. Openness does not undermine the existing participatory models and techniques, but provides conceptual means for their more effective application, and opens up avenues for developing new kinds of effective participatory practices that aim for societal development through collaborative creation of knowledge.
机译:环境和环境健康问题涉及多个方面的利益,例如由不同类型的组织和个人代表的政治,社会,经济和公共关注。毫不奇怪,利益相关者和公众参与已成为环境和环境健康政策与评估中的主要问题。包括世界各地的环境立法者在内,许多人已经讨论并论证了参与的必要性。原则上,通常认为参与是可取的,大多数学者和实践者的重点是进行参与,并使参与更加有效。在实践中,决策者,评估者和公众还对参与的有效性和重要性存有疑问,甚至导致破坏了决策和评估中的参与性实践。参与的目的可能很多,评估与评估之间互动的模式也可能不同。政策。为了设计和实施有效的参与性实践,有必要对参与,评估和决策之间的相互关系有扎实的概念理解。在本文中,我们要问,当前的评估,政策制定和参与的通用概念是否为实现有效参与提供了足够的框架?这个问题是通过审查参与环境和环境健康问题的评估和政策制定方法的范围以及最近的研究项目INTARESE和BENERIS的一些相关见解而解决的。在a)参与范围,b)信息获取,c)贡献范围,d)开放时间和e)贡献影响方面,为参与,评估和政策制定之间的关系提供了新视角。参与,评估和政策制定是内在交织在一起的复杂事物,具有相互关联的目标和结果。基于实施开放的经验,我们建议在环境和环境卫生问题的评估和政策制定中,将完全开放作为新的默认值,应该明确地提出偏离。开放不会破坏现有的参与模式和技术,但会为更有效地应用它们提供概念手段,并为发展新型有效参与实践开辟途径,这些实践旨在通过知识的共同创造来促进社会发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号