Comparative Effectiveness of Up To Three Lines of ChemotherapyTreatment Plans for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

摘要

Modern chemotherapy agents transformed standard care for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) but raised concerns about the financial burden of the disease. We studied comparative effectiveness of treatment plans that involve up to three lines of therapies and impact of treatment sequencing on health and cost outcomes. We employed a Markov model to represent the dynamically changing health status of mCRC patients and used Monte-Carlo simulation to evaluate various treatment plans consistent with existing guidelines. We calibrated our model by a meta-analysis of published data from an extensive list of clinical trials and measured the effectiveness of each plan in terms of cost per quality-adjusted life year. We examined the sensitivity of our model and results with respect to key parameters in two scenarios serving as base case and worst case for patients’ overall and progression-free survivals. The derived efficient frontiers included seven and five treatment plans in base case and worst case, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) ranged between $26,260 and $152,530 when the treatment plans on the efficient frontiers were compared against the least costly efficient plan in the base case, and between $21,256 and $60,040 in the worst case. All efficient plans were expected to leadto fewer than 2.5 adverse effects and on average successive adverse effects werespaced more than 9 weeks apart from each other in the base case. Based on ICER,all efficient treatment plans exhibit at least 87% chance of being efficient.Sensitivity analyses show that the ICERs were most dependent on drug acquisitioncost, distributions of progression-free and overall survivals, and healthutilities. We conclude that improvements in health outcomes may come at highincremental costs and are highly dependent in the order treatments areadministered.