首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Evidence-Based Spine-Care Journal >Microdiscectomy for the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation: An Evaluation of Reoperations and Long-Term Outcomes
【2h】

Microdiscectomy for the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation: An Evaluation of Reoperations and Long-Term Outcomes

机译:显微椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症:再次手术和长期结果的评价。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Design Retrospective case series. >Objective The objective of this study was to assess the reoperation rate after microdiscectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) in patients with ≥ 5-year follow-up and identify demographic, perioperative, and outcome-related differences between patients with and without a reoperation. >Methods The medical records, operative reports, and office notes of patients who had undergone microdiscectomy at a single institution between March 1994 and December 2007 were reviewed and long-term follow-up was assessed via a telephone questionnaire. >Results Forty patients (M:24, F:16) with an average age at surgery of 39.9 ± 12.5 years (range: 18–80) underwent microdiscectomy at the levels L5–S1 (n = 28, 70%), L4-L5 (n = 9, 22.5%), L3–L4 (n = 2, 5.0%), and L1–L2 (n = 1, 2.5%). After an average of 40.4 ± 40.1 months (range: 1–128), 25% of patients (10/40) required further spine surgery related to the initial microdiscectomy. At an average postoperative follow-up of 11.1 ± 4.0 years (range: 5–19), additional symptoms apart from back and leg pain were reported more frequently by patients who underwent a reoperation (p = 0.005). Patient satisfaction was significantly higher in patients who did not undergo a reoperation (p = 0.041). For the Oswestry disability index, pain intensity (p = 0.036), and pain-related sleep disturbances (p = 0.006) were reported to be more severe in the reoperation group. >Conclusions Microdiscectomy for the treatment of LDH results in a favorable long-term outcome in the majority of cases. The reoperation rate was higher in our series than reported in previous investigations with shorter follow-up. Although there were no statistically significant pre-/perioperative differences between patients with and without reoperation, our findings suggest a difference in self-reported long-term outcome measures.
机译:>设计回顾性案例系列。 >目的这项研究的目的是评估≥5年随访患者的微盘切除术后腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)的再手术率,并确定人口统计学,围手术期和结局-与没有再手术的患者之间的相关差异。 >方法对1994年3月至2007年12月间在同一机构接受过显微椎间盘切除术的患者的病历,手术报告和办公记录进行了回顾,并通过电话调查表对长期随访进行了评估。 >结果 40名平均手术年龄为39.9±12.5岁(范围:18-80)的患者(M:24,F:16)接受了L5–S1的微盘切除术(n = 28, 70%),L4-L5(n = 9,22.5%),L3-L4(n = 2,5.0%)和L1-L2(n = 1,2.5%)。平均40.4±40.1个月(范围:1-128)后,有25%(10/40)的患者需要进一步进行与初次微盘切除术相关的脊柱手术。术后平均随访时间为11.1±4.0岁(范围:5-19),再次手术的患者除背部和腿部疼痛外还出现了其他症状(p = 0.005)。未接受再手术的患者的满意度显着更高(p = 0.041)。对于Oswestry残疾指数,据报道在再手术组中疼痛强度(p =)0.036)和与疼痛相关的睡眠障碍(p = reported0.006)更为严重。 >结论在大多数情况下,微盘切除术治疗LDH的长期疗效良好。在我们的系列中,再手术率比以前的研究(随访时间较短)更高。尽管有无再手术患者之间的术前/围手术期差异无统计学意义,但我们的研究结果表明,自我报告的长期结局指标存在差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号