首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine : eCAM >Extracts of Tripterygium wilfordii Hook F in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials
【2h】

Extracts of Tripterygium wilfordii Hook F in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

机译:雷公藤雷克胡克F提取物治疗类风湿关节炎:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Clinical trials have reported the effects of Tripterygium wilfordii Hook F (TwHF) extracts (TEs) in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA); however, the results have been inconsistent. This meta-analysis is aimed to assess the safety of TEs and their effects on the treatment of RA. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effects of TEs and placebo (PBO) or disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in patients with RA were included. Weighted mean differences (MDs) were calculated for net changes by employing fixed-effect or random-effects models. After filtering, ten RCTs (involving 733 participants) were included in this study. The methodological quality of these studies was generally low. Compared with DMARDs, TEs alone produced a mild increase in grip strength (GS) (P = 0.02; standard mean difference (SMD) = 0.81; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.14 to 1.48). The most common adverse effects (AEs) of TEs were gastrointestinal discomfort, menstruation disorders, and amenorrhea. In conclusion, TEs, as a sort of “herbal DMARD,” could be as effective as synthetic DMARDs in the treatment of RA. However, the efficacy of TEs in treating RA should be further estimated with better designed, fully powered, confirmatory RCTs that apply the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) improvement criteria to evaluate their outcomes.
机译:临床试验报告了雷公藤多形钩提取物(TwHF)提取物(TEs)在类风湿关节炎(RA)治疗中的作用。但是,结果不一致。这项荟萃分析旨在评估TEs的安全性及其对RA治疗的影响。随机对照试验(RCT)比较了TE与安慰剂(PBO)或疾病缓解性抗风湿药(DMARDs)在RA患者中的作用。通过采用固定效应或随机效应模型计算净变化的加权平均差(MDs)。筛选后,本研究包括十个RCT(涉及733名参与者)。这些研究的方法学质量普遍较低。与DMARD相比,仅TE会产生轻度的握力(GS)(P = 0.02;标准平均差(SMD)= 0.81; 95%置信区间(CI):0.14至1.48)。 TEs最常见的不良反应(AEs)是胃肠不适,月经紊乱和闭经。总之,TEs作为一种“草药DMARD”在治疗RA中可能与合成DMARDs一样有效。但是,应采用设计更好,功能更强大,证实性的RCT进一步评估TEs治疗RA的疗效,这些RCT应用美国风湿病学会(ACR)改善标准评估其疗效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号