【2h】

Acupuncture for Chronic Pain in Japan: A Review

机译:日本针灸治疗慢性疼痛的研究进展

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Many Japanese reports of acupuncture and moxibustion for chronic pain are not listed in medical databases such as Medline. Therefore, they are not easily accessible to researchers outside of Japan. To complement existing reviews of acupuncture and moxibustion for chronic pain and to provide more detailed discussion and analysis, we did a literature search using ‘Igaku Chuo Zasshi Wed’ (Japana Centra Revuo Medicina) and ‘Citation Information by National Institute of Information’ covering the period 1978–2006. Original articles and case reports of acupuncture and moxibustion treatment of chronic pain were included. Animal studies, surveys, and news articles were excluded. Two independent reviewers extracted data from located articles in a pre-defined structured way, and assessed the likelihood of causality in each case. We located 57 papers written in Japanese (20 full papers, 37 case reports). Conditions examined were headache (12 trials), chronic low back pain (9 trials), rheumatoid arthritis (8 trials), temporomandibular dysfunction (8 trials), katakori (8 trials) and others (12 trials). While 23 were described as clinical control trials (CCTs), 11 employed a quasi-random method. Applying the 5-point Jadad quality assessment scoring system, the mean score was 1.5 ± 1.3 (SD). Eleven (52%) of the CCTs were conducted to determine a more effective procedure for acupuncture; these compared a certain type of acupuncture with another type of acupuncture or specific additional points. In particular, the trigger point acupuncture was widely used to treat chronic low back pain in Japan. Many reports of chronic pain treatment by acupuncture and moxibustion are listed in Japanese databases. From the data, we conclude that there is limited evidence that acupuncture is more effective than no treatment, and inconclusive evidence that trigger point acupuncture is more effective than placebo, sham acupuncture or standard care.
机译:日本的许多关于针灸和艾灸治疗慢性疼痛的报道并未在Medline等医学数据库中列出。因此,日本以外的研究人员不容易获得它们。为了补充现有的针灸疗法对慢性疼痛的评论并提供更详细的讨论和分析,我们使用了“ Igaku Chuo Zasshi Wed”(Japana Centra Revuo Medicina)和“ National Institute of Information”的“ Citation Information”进行了文献检索。 1978年至2006年。包括原始文章和针灸治疗慢性疼痛的病例报告。动物研究,调查和新闻报道被排除在外。两名独立的审阅者以预定的结构化方式从定位的文章中提取数据,并评估了每种情况下因果关系的可能性。我们找到了57篇用日语撰写的论文(20篇完整论文,37例案例报告)。检查的条件是头痛(12项试验),慢性腰痛(9项试验),类风湿关节炎(8项试验),颞下颌功能障碍(8项试验),片假名(8项试验)和其他(12项试验)。虽然有23个被描述为临床对照试验(CCT),但有11个采用了准随机方法。应用5分Jadad质量评估评分系统,平均得分为1.5±1.3(SD)。进行了11次(52%)的CCT,以确定更有效的针灸程序;这些将某种类型的针灸与另一种类型的针灸或特定的其他要点进行了比较。特别地,在日本,触发点针灸被广泛用于治疗慢性腰痛。日本数据库中列出了许多有关针灸治疗慢性疼痛的报道。从数据中我们可以得出结论,只有有限的证据表明针灸比没有治疗更有效,而没有结论性的证据表明触发点针灸比安慰剂,假针刺或标准护理更有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号