首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine : eCAM >An Evaluation of the Additive Effect of Natural Herbal Medicine on SARS or SARS-like Infectious Diseases in 2003: A Randomized Double-blind and Controlled Pilot Study
【2h】

An Evaluation of the Additive Effect of Natural Herbal Medicine on SARS or SARS-like Infectious Diseases in 2003: A Randomized Double-blind and Controlled Pilot Study

机译:2003年天然草药对SARS或类SARS传染病的累加作用评估:一项随机双盲和对照试验研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Natural herbal medicine (NHM) has been used to control infectious diseases for thousands of years. In view of the possible beneficial effect of NHM on SARS, we conducted this study to examine whether NHM is of any benefit as a supplementary treatment of SARS or SARS-like infectious disease. This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Twenty-eight patients fulfilled the WHO inclusion criteria and our exclusion criteria. All enrolled patients received routine western-medicine treatment. Patients were randomly allocated to one of the three supplementary treatment groups: NHM A (Group A, n = 9) NHM B (Group B, n = 9) or placebo (Group C, n = 10). Chest X-ray was done every 1 or 2 days for every patient. Reading radiologists use a standard 0–3 scoring system (0: no infiltration; 1: focal haziness or even small patchy lesion; 2: ground glass picture; 3: lobar consolidation) according to the severity of infiltration in each lung field (three lung fields in both right and left lungs). The main outcome measurements were the improving chest radiographic scores (IRS) and the duration (days) till improvement (DI). One patient from the placebo group passed away. Patients from NHM A took less days before showing improvement (6.7 ± 1.8) compared with placebo group (11.2 ± 4.9), which showed statistical significance (P = 0.04). The cases were too few to be conclusive, the initial observations seem to indicate NHM appears to be safe in non-criticallly ill patients and clinical trials are feasible in the setting of pandemic outbreaks.
机译:天然草药(NHM)已用于控制传染病数千年。考虑到NHM对SARS的潜在有益作用,我们进行了这项研究,以检查NHM作为SARS或SARS样传染病的补充治疗是否有任何益处。这是一项随机,双盲,安慰剂对照试验。 28位患者符合WHO纳入标准和我们的排除标准。所有入组患者均接受常规西药治疗。患者被随机分配到三个补充治疗组之一:NHM A(A组,n = 9),NHM B(B组,n = 9)或安慰剂(C组,n = 10)。每位患者每1或2天进行一次胸部X光检查。阅读放射科医生根据每个肺野(三肺)的浸润严重程度,使用标准的0-3评分系统(0:无浸润; 1:局部模糊或什至是小斑状病变; 2:毛玻璃片; 3:大叶巩固)右肺和左肺中的字段)。主要结局指标是胸部X线片评分(IRS)改善和改善前的持续时间(天)(DI)。安慰剂组的一名患者死亡。与安慰剂组(11.2±4.9)相比,NHM A患者的病情改善前(6.7±±1.8)天减少了(6.7±±1.8),具有统计学意义(P = 0.04)。这些病例太少而不能定论,初步观察似乎表明NHM在非重症患者中似乎是安全的,并且在大流行暴发中可以进行临床试验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号