首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience >The meaning of spikes from the neuron’s point of view: predictive homeostasis generates the appearance of randomness
【2h】

The meaning of spikes from the neuron’s point of view: predictive homeostasis generates the appearance of randomness

机译:从神经元的角度来看尖峰的含义是:预测的动态平衡会产生随机性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The conventional interpretation of spikes is from the perspective of an external observer with knowledge of a neuron’s inputs and outputs who is ignorant of the contents of the “black box” that is the neuron. Here we consider a neuron to be an observer and we interpret spikes from the neuron’s perspective. We propose both a descriptive hypothesis based on physics and logic, and a prescriptive hypothesis based on biological optimality. Our descriptive hypothesis is that a neuron’s membrane excitability is “known” and the amplitude of a future excitatory postsynaptic conductance (EPSG) is “unknown”. Therefore excitability is an expectation of EPSG amplitude and a spike is generated only when EPSG amplitude exceeds its expectation (“prediction error”). Our prescriptive hypothesis is that a diversity of synaptic inputs and voltage-regulated ion channels implement “predictive homeostasis”, working to insure that the expectation is accurate. The homeostatic ideal and optimal expectation would be achieved when an EPSP reaches precisely to spike threshold, so that spike output is exquisitely sensitive to small variations in EPSG input. To an external observer who knows neither EPSG amplitude nor membrane excitability, spikes would appear random if the neuron is making accurate predictions. We review experimental evidence that spike probabilities are indeed maintained near an average of 0.5 under natural conditions, and we suggest that the same principles may also explain why synaptic vesicle release appears to be “stochastic”. Whereas the present hypothesis accords with principles of efficient coding dating back to Barlow (), it contradicts decades of assertions that neural activity is substantially “random” or “noisy”. The apparent randomness is by design, and like many other examples of apparent randomness, it corresponds to the ignorance of external macroscopic observers about the detailed inner workings of a microscopic system.
机译:尖峰的常规解释是从外部观察者的角度出发,他们了解神经元的输入和输出,而他们却不知道神经元“黑匣子”的内容。在这里,我们将神经元视为观察者,并从神经元的角度解释尖峰。我们既提出了基于物理和逻辑的描述性假设,又提出了基于生物最优性的描述性假设。我们的描述性假设是“已知”神经元的膜兴奋性,而“未来”兴奋性突触后电导(EPSG)的幅度“未知”。因此,兴奋性是对EPSG幅度的期望,并且仅当EPSG幅度超过其期望值(“预测误差”)时才会产生尖峰。我们的说明性假设是,各种突触输入和电压调节离子通道均实现“预测稳态”,以确保期望值是准确的。当EPSP精确达到尖峰阈值时,将达到稳态的理想和最佳期望,因此尖峰输出对EPSG输入的细微变化非常敏感。对于既不了解EPSG振幅也不了解膜兴奋性的外部观察者,如果神经元做出准确的预测,则峰值将随机出现。我们回顾了实验证据,证明在自然条件下,峰值概率确实保持在平均0.5左右,并且我们建议相同的原理也可以解释为什么突触囊泡释放看起来是“随机的”。尽管目前的假设符合可追溯到Barlow()的有效编码原则,但它与数十年来神经活动实质上是“随机”或“嘈杂”的断言相矛盾。表观随机性是设计使然,并且像表观随机性的许多其他示例一样,它对应于外部宏观观察者对微观系统详细内部工作的无知。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号