【2h】

Can We Measure Memes?

机译:我们可以测量模因吗?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Memes are the fundamental unit of cultural evolution and have been left upon the periphery of cognitive neuroscience due to their inexact definition and the consequent presumption that they are impossible to measure. Here it is argued that although a precise definition of memes is rather difficult it does not preclude highly controlled experiments studying the neural substrates of their initiation and replication. In this paper, memes are termed as either internally or externally represented (i-memes/e-memes) in relation to whether they are represented as a neural substrate within the central nervous system or in some other form within our environment. It is argued that neuroimaging technology is now sufficiently advanced to image the connectivity profiles of i-memes and critically, to measure changes to i-memes over time, i.e., as they evolve. It is argued that it is wrong to simply pass off memes as an alternative term for “stimulus” and “learnt associations” as it does not accurately account for the way in which natural stimuli may dynamically “evolve” as clearly observed in our cultural lives.
机译:模因是文化进化的基本单位,由于其定义不准确以及由此带来的无法测量的假设,它们被留在认知神经科学的外围。在这里,尽管对模因进行精确的定义是相当困难的,但它并不排除研究神经元的启动和复制的高度受控的实验。在本文中,关于模因在中枢神经系统内是神经基质还是在环境中以其他形式存在,被称为内部或外部模因(i-模因/ e-模因)。有人认为,神经成像技术现在已经足够先进,可以对i-meme的连通性进行成像,并且可以严格地衡量i-meme随时间(即随着演变)的变化。有人认为,简单地将模因作为“刺激”和“学习协会”的代名词是错误的,因为它不能准确地说明自然刺激在我们的文化生活中可以清楚地动态“演变”的方式。 。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号