首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Human Neuroscience >Understanding Attentional Modulation of Binocular Rivalry: A Framework Based on Biased Competition
【2h】

Understanding Attentional Modulation of Binocular Rivalry: A Framework Based on Biased Competition

机译:了解双眼竞争的注意调制:基于有偏竞争的框架。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Starting from early scientific explorations of binocular rivalry, researchers have wondered about the degree to which an observer can exert voluntary attentional control over rivalry dynamics. The answer to this question would not only reveal the extent to which we may determine our own conscious visual experience, but also advance our understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying binocular rivalry. Classic studies, intriguingly, reached contradictory conclusions, ranging from an absence of attentional control, as advocated by Breese, to nearly complete control of rivalry dynamics, as reported by Helmholtz. Recent investigations have revisited this question, but the results have continued to echo the conflicting findings of earlier studies, seemingly precluding a comprehensive understanding of attentional effects on rivalry. Here, we review both classic and modern studies, and propose a unifying framework derived from the biased competition theory of attention. The key assumption of this theory is that the nature of stimulus conflict determines the limits of attentional modulation. For example, a condition in which unresolved stimulus conflict transpires through many levels of visual processing should be very susceptible to attentional control. When applied to binocular rivalry, this framework predicts strong attentional modulations under conditions of unresolved stimulus conflict (e.g., initial selection) and conditions where conflict is resolved at higher levels of visual processing (e.g., stimulus rivalry). Additionally, the efficacy of attentional control over rivalry can be increased by utilization of demanding, behaviorally relevant tasks, and likely through perceptual training paradigms. We show that this framework can help facilitate the understanding and synthesis of a diverse set of results on attentional control over rivalry, and we propose several directions for future research on this interesting topic.
机译:从对双眼竞争的早期科学探索开始,研究人员一直想知道观察者可以在多大程度上对竞争动态施加自愿的注意力控制。这个问题的答案不仅将揭示我们可以确定自己的有意识视觉体验的程度,而且还将增进我们对双眼竞争背后的神经机制的理解。有趣的是,经典研究得出了自相矛盾的结论,从布雷斯(Breese)提倡的注意力控制缺失到竞争动力学的几乎完全控制(Helmholtz报告)。最近的研究重新审视了这个问题,但结果仍与早期研究的矛盾发现相呼应,似乎妨碍了对注意力对竞争的影响的全面理解。在这里,我们回顾了经典研究和现代研究,并提出了从有偏向的关注竞争理论中得出的统一框架。该理论的关键假设是,刺激冲突的性质决定了注意力调制的极限。例如,通过许多级别的视觉处理无法解决刺激冲突的情况应该非常容易引起注意控制。当应用于双眼竞争时,该框架预测在未解决的刺激冲突的条件下(例如,初始选择)和在较高视觉处理水平下解决冲突的条件(例如,刺激竞争)下的强烈注意力调节。此外,注意竞争控制的有效性可以通过利用要求严格的,行为上相关的任务来提高,并且有可能通过感知训练范式来提高。我们表明,该框架可以帮助促进对竞争控制中注意力控制的各种结果的理解和综合,并且我们为该有趣主题的未来研究提出了几个方向。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号