首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Endocrinology >Evaluation of Spheroid 3D Culture Methods to Study a Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasm Cell Line
【2h】

Evaluation of Spheroid 3D Culture Methods to Study a Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasm Cell Line

机译:评估球形3D培养方法以研究胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤细胞系

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (pNEN) are rare tumors which treatment still represent an important clinical problem, due to the paucity of medical treatments. Due to tumor complexity, techniques as 3D cultures are important to study drug activity in a more realistic model. This study aims to compare three different 3D culture methods in order to understand which one can be considered the best option in terms of experimental easiness and reproducibility in studying the efficacy of a target drug on pNEN. The BON1 cell line was used as a pNEN model and the well-known Receptor Tyrosine Kinase inhibitor Sunitinib was used in order to better investigate the different features of each method. The investigated methods are: (1) 96-well hanging drop plates (HD plates), (2) 24-well plates with a cell-repellent surface, and (3) ultra-low attachment 96-well plates with clear round bottom (ULA plates). The evaluated parameters during the study were: cell seeding, easiness in spheroids formation, morphology, culture maintenance, medium change, spheroids monitoring, picture quality, spheroid perimeter measurement reproducibility error, possibility to perform assays into the seeding plate, overall time of the experiment. Moreover, we investigated how culture methods can influence experimental outcomes evaluating perimeter changes, cell viability and immunohistochemistry of spheroids treated with different Sunitinib concentrations. Results showed that each method has weak and strong points but, considering the easiness of spheroids maintenance and reproducibility results, ULA plates method appears to be the best approach to culture BON1 spheroids and, therefore, to study pNEN.
机译:胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤(pNEN)是罕见的肿瘤,由于缺乏药物治疗,仍然代表着重要的临床问题。由于肿瘤的复杂性,作为3D培养物的技术对于在更现实的模型中研究药物活性非常重要。这项研究旨在比较三种不同的3D培养方法,以了解在研究目标药物对pNEN的疗效时,在实验的易用性和可重复性方面,哪一种可以被视为最佳选择。 BON1细胞系用作pNEN模型,并使用众所周知的受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂Sunitinib来更好地研究每种方法的不同特征。研究的方法是:(1)96孔悬挂式滴液板(HD板),(2)带有细胞排斥表面的24孔板,以及(3)超低附着力的带有透明圆底的96孔板( ULA板)。研究过程中评估的参数包括:细胞接种,球状体形成的难易程度,形态,培养维持,培养基变化,球状体监测,图像质量,球状体周长测量重现性误差,在接种板上进行化验的可能性,整个实验时间。此外,我们研究了培养方法如何影响评估用不同舒尼替尼浓度处理的球体的周长变化,细胞活力和免疫组化的实验结果。结果表明,每种方法都有其弱点和长处,但考虑到球体维护的难易程度和可重复性结果,ULA平板法似乎是培养BON1球体的最佳方法,因此,用于研究pNEN。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号