首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience >Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Over the Frontal Polar Area on Motor and Executive Functions in Parkinson’s Disease; A Pilot Study
【2h】

Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Over the Frontal Polar Area on Motor and Executive Functions in Parkinson’s Disease; A Pilot Study

机译:额极极区经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)对帕金森氏病运动和执行功能的影响;初步研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder with motor and non-motor symptoms due to degeneration of dopaminergic neurons. The current pharmacological treatments induce complications associated with long-term use. However, current stimulation techniques for PD treatment, such as deep brain stimulation (DBS), are too invasive. In this context, non-invasive brain stimulation including transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) may be a safe and effective alternative treatment for PD. We previously reported that anodal tDCS over the frontal polar area (FPA) improved motor functions in heathy subjects. Therefore, in the present study, effects of tDCS over the FPA on motor and cognitive functions of PD patients were analyzed. Nine PD patients (3 men and 6 women) participated in this cross over study with three tDCS protocols; anodal, cathodal or sham tDCS over the FPA. Each tDCS protocol was applied for 1 week (5 times/week). Before and after each protocol, motor and cognitive functions of the patients were assessed using Unified PD Rating Scale [UPDRS (part III: motor examination)], Fugl Meyer Assessment set (FMA), Simple Test for Evaluating hand Function (STEF) and Trail Making Test A (TMT-A). The results indicated that anodal stimulation significantly decreased scores of motor disability in UPDRS-III compared with sham and cathodal stimulation, and significantly increased scores of motor functions in FMA compared with sham stimulation. Furthermore, anodal stimulation significantly decreased time to complete a motor task requiring high dexterity in STEF compared with those requiring low and medium levels of dexterity. In addition, anodal stimulation significantly decreased time to complete the TMT-A task, which requires executive functions, compared with sham stimulation. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first clinical research reporting that tDCS over the FPA successfully improved the motor and non-motor functions in PD patients. These findings suggest that tDCS over the FPA might be a useful alternative for the treatment of PD patients.
机译:帕金森氏病(PD)是一种多巴胺能神经元变性引起的神经退行性疾病,具有运动和非运动症状。当前的药物治疗引起与长期使用相关的并发症。但是,当前用于PD治疗的刺激技术,例如深部脑部刺激(DBS),过于侵入性。在这种情况下,包括经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)在内的非侵入性脑刺激可能是PD的安全有效替代疗法。我们先前曾报道过,额叶极区(FPA)上的阳极tDCS改善了健康受试者的运动功能。因此,在本研究中,分析了tDCS对FPA的影响对PD患者的运动和认知功能的影响。 9名PD患者(3名男性和6名女性)通过三种tDCS方案参加了这项交叉研究。 FPA上的阳极,阴极或假tDCS。每种tDCS方案均应用1周(5次/周)。在每种方案之前和之后,使用统一的PD评分量表[UPDRS(第三部分:运动检查)],Fugl Meyer评估集(FMA),评估手功能的简单测试(STEF)和追踪评估患者的运动和认知功能进行测试A(TMT-A)。结果表明,与假刺激和阴极刺激相比,阳极刺激在UPDRS-III中显着降低了运动障碍评分,在FMA中与假刺激相比显着增加了FMA的运动功能评分。此外,与需要低和中等灵活性水平的人相比,阳极刺激显着减少了完成需要在STEF中具有较高灵活性的运动任务的时间。此外,与假刺激相比,阳极刺激显着减少了完成TMT-A任务所需时间,该任务需要执行功能。据我们所知,这是第一份临床研究报告,表明tDCS优于FPA成功改善了PD患者的运动和非运动功能。这些发现表明,tDCS超过FPA可能是治疗PD患者的有用选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号