首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Immunology >Bad News: Analysis of the Quality of Information on Influenza Prevention Returned by Google in English and Italian
【2h】

Bad News: Analysis of the Quality of Information on Influenza Prevention Returned by Google in English and Italian

机译:坏消息:Google以英语和意大利语返回的有关预防流感的信息质量的分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Information available to the public influences the approach of the population toward vaccination against influenza compared with other preventative approaches. In this study, we have analyzed the first 200 websites returned by searching Google on two topics (prevention of influenza and influenza vaccine), in English and Italian. For all the four searches above, websites were classified according to their typology (government, commercial, professional, portals, etc.) and for their trustworthiness as defined by the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) score, which assesses whether they provide some basic elements of information quality (IQ): authorship, currency, disclosure, and references. The type of information described was also assessed to add another dimension of IQ. Websites on influenza prevention were classified according to the type of preventative approach mentioned (vaccine, lifestyle, hygiene, complementary medicine, etc.), whether the approaches were in agreement with evidence-based medicine (EBM) or not. Websites on influenza vaccination were classified as pro- or anti-vaccine, or neutral. The great majority of websites described EBM approaches to influenza prevention and had a pro-vaccine orientation. Government websites mainly pointed at EBM preventative approaches and had a pro-vaccine orientation, while there was a higher proportion of commercial websites among those which promote non-EBM approaches. Although the JAMA score was lower in commercial websites, it did not correlate with the preventative approaches suggested or the orientation toward vaccines. For each of the four search engine result pages (SERP), only one website displayed the health-of-the-net (HON) seal. In the SERP on vaccines, journalistic websites were the most abundant category and ranked higher than average in both languages. Analysis using natural language processing showed that journalistic websites were mostly reporting news about two specific topics (different in the two languages). While the ranking by Google favors EBM approaches and, in English, does not promote commercial websites, in both languages it gives a great advantage to news. Thus, the type of news published during the influenza season probably has a key importance in orienting the public opinion due to its high visibility. This raises important questions on the relationships between health IQ, trustworthiness, and newsworthiness.
机译:与其他预防方法相比,公众可获得的信息会影响人群的流感疫苗接种方法。在这项研究中,我们分析了搜索Google返回的前200个网站,搜索了两个主题(预防流感和流感疫苗),分别为英语和意大利语。对于上述所有四个搜索,网站均按照其类型(政府,商业,专业,门户等)进行分类,并按照《美国医学会杂志》(JAMA)评分定义的可信赖性进行分类,以评估它们是否提供信息质量(IQ)的一些基本要素:作者身份,货币,披露和参考。还评估了所描述的信息类型,以增加智商的另一个维度。根据所提到的预防方法的类型(疫苗,生活方式,卫生,辅助医学等)对有关流感预防的网站进行分类,无论这些方法是否与循证医学(EBM)一致。有关流感疫苗接种的网站分为前疫苗或抗疫苗,或中立的。绝大多数网站都介绍了EBM预防流感的方法,并且倾向于疫苗接种。政府网站主要针对循证医学的预防方法,并倾向于疫苗接种,而在推广非EBM方法的商业网站中,商业网站所占比例较高。尽管JAMA分数在商业网站上较低,但与建议的预防方法或疫苗的方向无关。对于四个搜索引擎结果页面(SERP)中的每一个,只有一个网站显示了网络运行状况(HON)标记。在关于疫苗的SERP中,新闻网站是最丰富的类别,并且在两种语言中的排名均高于平均水平。使用自然语言处理进行的分析表明,新闻网站主要报道有关两个特定主题的新闻(两种语言有所不同)。虽然Google的排名偏爱采用EBM的方法,并且英语不会促进商业网站的发展,但两种语言都给新闻带来了很大的优势。因此,由于流感季节的知名度很高,因此在流感季节期间发布的新闻类型可能对引导公众舆论具有至关重要的意义。这就提出了有关健康智商,可信度和新闻价值之间关系的重要问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号