首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Neuroinformatics >Epileptic Seizure Detection Based on EEG Signals and CNN
【2h】

Epileptic Seizure Detection Based on EEG Signals and CNN

机译:基于EEG信号和CNN的癫痫发作检测

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Epilepsy is a neurological disorder that affects approximately fifty million people according to the World Health Organization. While electroencephalography (EEG) plays important roles in monitoring the brain activity of patients with epilepsy and diagnosing epilepsy, an expert is needed to analyze all EEG recordings to detect epileptic activity. This method is obviously time-consuming and tedious, and a timely and accurate diagnosis of epilepsy is essential to initiate antiepileptic drug therapy and subsequently reduce the risk of future seizures and seizure-related complications. In this study, a convolutional neural network (CNN) based on raw EEG signals instead of manual feature extraction was used to distinguish ictal, preictal, and interictal segments for epileptic seizure detection. We compared the performances of time and frequency domain signals in the detection of epileptic signals based on the intracranial Freiburg and scalp CHB-MIT databases to explore the potential of these parameters. Three types of experiments involving two binary classification problems (interictal vs. preictal and interictal vs. ictal) and one three-class problem (interictal vs. preictal vs. ictal) were conducted to explore the feasibility of this method. Using frequency domain signals in the Freiburg database, average accuracies of 96.7, 95.4, and 92.3% were obtained for the three experiments, while the average accuracies for detection in the CHB-MIT database were 95.6, 97.5, and 93% in the three experiments. Using time domain signals in the Freiburg database, the average accuracies were 91.1, 83.8, and 85.1% in the three experiments, while the signal detection accuracies in the CHB-MIT database were only 59.5, 62.3, and 47.9% in the three experiments. Based on these results, the three cases are effectively detected using frequency domain signals. However, the effective identification of the three cases using time domain signals as input samples is achieved for only some patients. Overall, the classification accuracies of frequency domain signals are significantly increased compared to time domain signals. In addition, frequency domain signals have greater potential than time domain signals for CNN applications.
机译:据世界卫生组织称,癫痫病是一种神经系统疾病,大约影响五千万人。尽管脑电图(EEG)在监测癫痫患者的大脑活动和诊断癫痫中起着重要作用,但仍需要专家来分析所有EEG记录以检测癫痫活动。这种方法显然是费时且乏味的,并且及时准确地诊断癫痫对于启动抗癫痫药物治疗并降低未来发作和发作相关并发症的风险至关重要。在这项研究中,基于原始EEG信号而不是人工特征提取的卷积神经网络(CNN)用于区分发作,发作和发作间段,以进行癫痫发作检测。我们比较了时域和频域信号在基于颅内弗莱堡和头皮CHB-MIT数据库的癫痫信号检测中的性能,以探索这些参数的潜力。为了进行这种方法的可行性,进行了三种类型的实验,涉及两个二元分类问题(间质性与发作性和间质性与发作性)和一种三类问题(间质性与发作性与发作性)。使用弗莱堡数据库中的频域信号,三个实验的平均准确度分别为96.7、95.4和92.3%,而CHB-MIT数据库中检测到的平均准确度在三个实验中分别为95.6、97.5和93% 。使用弗莱堡数据库中的时域信号,在三个实验中的平均准确度分别为91.1、83.8和85.1%,而在CHB-MIT数据库中,在三个实验中的平均信号检测准确度仅为59.5、62.3和47.9%。基于这些结果,使用频域信号可以有效地检测出这三种情况。但是,仅对某些患者使用时域信号作为输入样本对这三种情况进行了有效识别。总体而言,与时域信号相比,频域信号的分类精度显着提高。另外,对于CNN应用,频域信号比时域信号具有更大的潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号